Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Shoulder Pain: Dose Response
Implanted PNS for Shoulder Pain in Stroke
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this RCT is explore the mechanism for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain (HSP) reduction due to treatment with peripheral nerve stimulation. We will explore the association of subject-specific clinical and demographic information and pain relief from PNS. We will explore the possible role of central sensitization mechanisms in perpetuating pain via measures of sensory and pain perception. Lastly, we will explore the dose-response association of muscle-contraction from PNS and pain reduction, completion of activities of daily living (ADLs), and improvement in quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 18, 2021
CompletedJune 18, 2021
June 1, 2021
2.8 years
October 6, 2016
December 18, 2020
June 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Short Form (SF) Question 3 (BPI-SF3)
Brief Pain Inventory(BPI) Short Form 3: The BPI has excellent psychometrics and is recommended for the assessment of pain in clinical trials. The developers of the BPI recommend BPI SF-3, the "pain worst" rating, as the primary response metric. The question asks participants to rate their worst pain in the prior 7-d on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, where "0" indicates "No pain" and "10" indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine." A lower score is better.
End of Treatment (EOT), EOT + 3 mo
Other Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events (Related)
Electrode Implant, Start of Stimulation, 1 week after start of stimulation, 2 weeks after start of stimulation, end of treatment (EOT), EOT + 1mo, EOT + 2 mo, EOT + 3 mo
Study Arms (3)
PNS (3 hr/day)
EXPERIMENTALThe PNS (3 hr/day) Group will receive peripheral nerve stimulation treatment for three weeks (3 hours daily) with an Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator following a one week electrode stabilization period.
PNS (6 hr/day)
EXPERIMENTALThe PNS (6 hr/day) Group will receive peripheral nerve stimulation treatment for three weeks (6 hours daily) with an Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator following a one week electrode stabilization period.
PNS (9 hr/day)
EXPERIMENTALThe PNS (9 hr/day) Group will receive peripheral nerve stimulation treatment for three weeks (9 hours daily) with an Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator following a one week electrode stabilization period.
Interventions
The stimulation system includes an external stimulator, percutaneous lead and pad. The stimulator snaps onto the pad. The pad has an embedded power source but also serves as the anode. The 1-channel stimulator outputs a biphasic current waveform with current pulse parameter ranges suitable for PNS. The percutaneous lead is inserted using an introducer (like a hypodermic needle) which is withdrawn and the lead is retained in the muscle by a barb at its tip. After a 1-week stabilization period, stimulation is initiated (daily dose is Group-dependent). Stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period is 3 weeks after which the lead will be removed. Total time of electrode implantation is no more than 29 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- shoulder pain localized to the glenohumeral joint, subacromial area or deltoid insertion associated with: a) rest; b) passive abduction or external rotation range of motion (ROM); c) active abduction ROM; or, d) manual palpation;
- shoulder pain onset or worsening after the most recent stroke;
- weakness of shoulder abductors (≤4/5 on MRC if isolated movement is present);
- ≥ 21-yrs old; \< 90-yrs old;
- time of stroke ≥ 3-mo;
- duration of HSP ≥3-mo;
- HSP with moderate to severe pain (BPI SF-3 ≥ 4);
- cognitive and communication ability to fulfill study requirements (cognitive ability based upon a score of ≥24 on the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE));
- availability of reliable adult who can assist with study procedures if necessary;
- willing and able to report shoulder pain and other conditions and complete study visits throughout the 4 month study period.
You may not qualify if:
- joint or overlying skin infection or history of recurrent skin infections;
- insensate skin;
- need to take \> 1 opioid and \> 1 nonopioid analgesic medication for HSP;
- regular intake of pain medications for another chronic pain;
- botox injection or subacromial steroid injections to the shoulder within the past 12 wks;
- receiving OT or PT for HSP;
- bleeding disorder or INR \> 3.0;
- sensitivity to skin surface electrodes and/or medical-grade adhesives, gels, tapes;
- medical instability;
- pregnancy;
- uncontrolled seizures (\>1/mo for 6-mo);
- history of cardiac arrhythmia with hemodynamic instability;
- history of lidocaine allergy;
- history of Parkinson's disease, SCI, TBI, MS, or ipsilateral UE lower motor neuron lesion;
- history of complex regional pain syndrome, myofacial pain syndrome, other pain conditions (investigator discretion);
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Related Publications (15)
Wilson RD, Gunzler DD, Bennett ME, Chae J. Peripheral nerve stimulation compared with usual care for pain relief of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;93(1):17-28. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000011.
PMID: 24355994BACKGROUNDChae J, Ng A, Yu DT, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Fang ZP. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for shoulder pain in hemiplegia: does time from stroke onset predict treatment success? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):561-7. doi: 10.1177/1545968306298412. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
PMID: 17369520BACKGROUNDChae J, Wilson RD, Bennett ME, Lechman TE, Stager KW. Single-lead percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a case series. Pain Pract. 2013 Jan;13(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00541.x. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
PMID: 22448759BACKGROUNDChae J, Yu D, Walker M. Percutaneous, intramuscular neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and pain in chronic hemiplegia: a case report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;80(4):296-301. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200104000-00014.
PMID: 11277137BACKGROUNDChae J, Yu DT, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Grill JH, Fang ZP. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a 12-month follow-up of a multiple-center, randomized clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;84(11):832-42. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184154.01880.72.
PMID: 16244520BACKGROUNDWilson RD, Bennett ME, Lechman TE, Stager KW, Chae J. Single-lead percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):837-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.003.
PMID: 21530732BACKGROUNDYu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Fang ZP. Percutaneous intramuscular neuromuscular electric stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and pain in patients with chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jan;82(1):20-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18666.
PMID: 11239281BACKGROUNDYu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Grill JH, Feldstein M, Fang ZP. Intramuscular neuromuscular electric stimulation for poststroke shoulder pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.015.
PMID: 15129391BACKGROUNDYu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Hart RL, Petroski GF. Comparing stimulation-induced pain during percutaneous (intramuscular) and transcutaneous neuromuscular electric stimulation for treating shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;82(6):756-60. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23310.
PMID: 11387579BACKGROUNDKoog YH, Jin SS, Yoon K, Min BI. Interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(4):282-91. doi: 10.3109/09638280903127685.
PMID: 20055567BACKGROUNDSnels IA, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain in the Netherlands: results of a national survey. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Feb;14(1):20-7. doi: 10.1191/026921500668239146.
PMID: 10688341BACKGROUNDSoo Hoo J, Paul T, Chae J, Wilson RD. Central hypersensitivity in chronic hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;92(1):1-9; quiz 10-3. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827df862.
PMID: 23255268BACKGROUNDWilson RD, Harris MA, Gunzler DD, Bennett ME, Chae J. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain in subacromial impingement syndrome: a case series. Neuromodulation. 2014 Dec;17(8):771-6; discussion 776. doi: 10.1111/ner.12152. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
PMID: 24512114BACKGROUNDWilson RD, Harris MA, Bennett ME, Chae J. Single-lead percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of shoulder pain from subacromial impingement syndrome. PM R. 2012 Aug;4(8):624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.03.002.
PMID: 22920317BACKGROUNDPaul TM, Soo Hoo J, Chae J, Wilson RD. Central hypersensitivity in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
PMID: 22789774BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial did not meet the goal of 10 participants per group. Results should be interpreted with caution.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Richard Wilson, MD
- Organization
- MetroHealth Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard D Wilson, MD
MetroHealth Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2016
First Posted
October 7, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
June 18, 2021
Results First Posted
June 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share