Electrical Stimulation for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Post-stroke shoulder pain is a major rehabilitation problem affecting moderate to severely impaired stroke survivors. Surface electrical stimulation (ES) of muscles surrounding the hemiparetic shoulder has been demonstrated to be beneficial, but despite the evidence for therapeutic benefit, the clinical implementation of surface ES for poststroke shoulder pain has been difficult. In order to address the limitations of surface ES, the investigative team pioneered the development of percutaneous intramuscular (IM) ES for the treatment of post-stroke shoulder pain. However, prior to acceptance by the clinical community, additional gaps in the scientific and clinical knowledge need to be addressed. This study begins to do so. The primary objective is to estimate the relative pain reduction associated with IM ES vs. "usual care." We hypothesize that the IM ES group will exhibit a larger effect size with respect to pain reduction compared to "usual care". A secondary objective is to estimate the effect on health related QOL of IM ES vs. "usual care." Demonstration of improvement in QOL will validate the clinical relevance of the intervention. We hypothesize that the IM ES group will exhibit greater improvement in health related QOL compared to "usual care".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 12, 2017
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
December 1, 2017
3.1 years
May 12, 2010
September 15, 2017
December 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
The BPI is a pain questionnaire, which assesses both pain intensity (sensory dimension) and the interference (reactive dimension) of pain in daily activities. Pain intensity is measured on a 0 - 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible.
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
ShoulderQ VGRS Scale
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
SF-36 Bodily Pain Component
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
Pain-free External ROM, Degrees
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper Extremity
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
Pain Interference Questionnaire
Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)
EXPERIMENTALThe IM ES Group will receive electrical stimulation treatment for three weeks (6 hrs daily) with an Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator following a one week electrode stabilization period.
Usual Care (UC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Usual Care Group will receive outpatient therapy for four weeks, coupled with prescribed daily home exercises.
Interventions
A sterile percutaneous IM electrode is implanted in the shoulder using a 20-gauge hypodermic needle and connected to an external cable. The exit site and electrode are covered by a bandage, but the cable extends out. After a one week stabilization period, the cable is connected to a stimulator. A self-adhesive surface electrode serves as the indifferent electrode. Stimulation intensity is set by the investigator. The prescription for daily stimulation treatment will be 6 hrs. The duty cycle and daily dose will remain constant throughout the treatment, but stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period will be 3 weeks, after which the electrode will be removed. Total time of electrode implantation is no more than 29 days.
Subjects will receive 8 hrs of outpatient therapy over a four week period from a treating therapist, coupled with prescribed daily home exercises. The therapist will implement an individualized treatment plan consistent with the needs of the participant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- shoulder pain localized to the glenohumeral joint, subacromial area or deltoid insertion associated with any of the following conditions: a) rest; b) passive abduction or external rotation ROM; c) active abduction or external rotation ROM; or d) manual palpation
- weakness of shoulder abductors (≤4/5 on MRC if isolated movement is present)
- age ≥21-yrs
- time from stroke ≥ 3-mo
- shoulder pain onset after the most recent stroke
- duration of shoulder pain ≥ 3-mo
- severity of shoulder pain on BPI-SF 3 ≥4
- cognitive ability to fulfill study requirements \[a) exhibit 3 object immediate and 30 minute recall; b) ability to use a numeric rating scale (using a 0-10 numeric rating scale) by correctly ranking the tightness they feel on the unaffected arm of 3 low-pressure inflations with a standard sphygmomanometer cuff which follow a predetermined sequence (20, 40 and 0 mm Hg); and c) ability to follow 3-stage commands\]
- availability of a reliable adult who can check the skin and assist the participant with the treatment protocol
- willing and able to report severity of shoulder pain throughout the study period
- willing to make all scheduled study visits post-implantation.
You may not qualify if:
- evidence of joint or overlying skin infection
- insensate skin
- \>1 opioid or nonopioid analgesics daily for shoulder pain
- daily intake of pain medications for any other chronic pain
- intra-articular or subacromial steroid injections to the shoulder in the previous 12-wks
- botulinum toxin injection to the trapezius, pectoralis or subscapularis muscle in the previous 12-wks
- receiving physical or occupational therapies for shoulder pain
- physician-diagnosed shoulder pathology symptomatic within the 5 yrs prior to CVA
- bleeding disorder
- INR\>3.0 for those on warfarin \[INR\>3.0\]
- poorly controlled diabetes \[HbA1c\>7.0\]
- medical instability
- pregnancy
- uncontrolled seizures (\>1/mo for 6-mo)
- uncompensated hemi-neglect
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Related Publications (5)
Yu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Fang ZP. Percutaneous intramuscular neuromuscular electric stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and pain in patients with chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jan;82(1):20-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18666.
PMID: 11239281BACKGROUNDYu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Grill JH, Feldstein M, Fang ZP. Intramuscular neuromuscular electric stimulation for poststroke shoulder pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.015.
PMID: 15129391BACKGROUNDChae J, Yu DT, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Grill JH, Fang ZP. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a 12-month follow-up of a multiple-center, randomized clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;84(11):832-42. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184154.01880.72.
PMID: 16244520BACKGROUNDChae J, Ng A, Yu DT, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Fang ZP. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for shoulder pain in hemiplegia: does time from stroke onset predict treatment success? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):561-7. doi: 10.1177/1545968306298412. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
PMID: 17369520BACKGROUNDWilson RD, Gunzler DD, Bennett ME, Chae J. Peripheral nerve stimulation compared with usual care for pain relief of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;93(1):17-28. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000011.
PMID: 24355994DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Richard WIlson, MD
- Organization
- MetroHealth Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Chae, MD
MetroHealth Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof Vice Chair Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2010
First Posted
May 14, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Results First Posted
December 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share