Postoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain
Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Limb loss is frequently associated with postamputation pain that can be challenging to treat and often involves opioids. Advances in the field of neuromodulation has led to development of an intentionally reversible percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system that has had promising results when treating chronic postamputation pain. PNS may offer sustained pain relief even after the treatment period has ended. Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of PNS in the acute postoperative period, which may be a critical time to control pain as those with higher pain appear to be at higher risk for developing persistent post-procedural pain. The investigators of this study aim to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PNS in the acute postoperative period and determine the feasibility of completing a randomized controlled treatment outcome study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 21, 2021
CompletedJuly 21, 2021
June 1, 2021
3.4 years
February 7, 2018
April 13, 2021
June 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.
Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3
Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number Taking Opioids
Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12
Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)
Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores
Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8
Pain Interference
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Weeks 4, 8, and 12
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALStandard medical therapy and 30 to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation starting within 7 days after surgery
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard medical therapy only
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nontraumatic transfemoral (above-the-knee) or transtibial (below-the-knee) amputation
- Presence of postamputation pain rated at least 4 or more
You may not qualify if:
- Beck Depression Inventory score greater than 20
- Systemic infection
- Immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive medications
- Implanted electronic device
- Pregnancy
- Previous allergy to skin contact materials and/or anesthetic agent
- Altered mental status
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
Related Publications (31)
Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, Edwards WT, Robinson LR. Preamputation pain and acute pain predict chronic pain after lower extremity amputation. J Pain. 2007 Feb;8(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
PMID: 16949876BACKGROUNDKaranikolas M, Aretha D, Tsolakis I, Monantera G, Kiekkas P, Papadoulas S, Swarm RA, Filos KS. Optimized perioperative analgesia reduces chronic phantom limb pain intensity, prevalence, and frequency: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2011 May;114(5):1144-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820fc7d2.
PMID: 21368651BACKGROUNDKent ML, Hsia HJ, Van de Ven TJ, Buchheit TE. Perioperative Pain Management Strategies for Amputation: A Topical Review. Pain Med. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):504-519. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw110.
PMID: 27402960BACKGROUNDCapdevila X, Bringuier S, Borgeat A. Infectious risk of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):182-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190bd5b. No abstract available.
PMID: 19104185BACKGROUNDApfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
PMID: 12873949BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
PMID: 20889937BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Grant SA. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Postoperative Analgesia: Could Neurostimulation Replace Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):720-722. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000481. No abstract available.
PMID: 27685345BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Saulino MF, Chae J, Peckham PH, Grant SA, Gilmore CA, Donohue MC, deBock MG, Wongsarnpigoon A, Boggs JW. Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System. Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):753-762. doi: 10.1111/papr.12523. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
PMID: 27676323BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Ball ST, Gabriel RA, Sztain JF, Monahan AM, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Said ET, Parekh J, Grant SA, Wongsarnpigoon A, Boggs JW. A Feasibility Study of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Neuromodulation. 2019 Jul;22(5):653-660. doi: 10.1111/ner.12790. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
PMID: 30024078BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Finneran JJ 4th, Jaeger PT, Schwartz AK, Ahmed SS. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):580-589. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000819.
PMID: 29905630BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Nguyen PL, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Sztain JF, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Meunier MJ, Hentzen ER, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory rotator cuff repair. A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):310-318. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100121. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PMID: 30770421BACKGROUNDGilmore C, Ilfeld B, Rosenow J, Li S, Desai M, Hunter C, Rauck R, Kapural L, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen S, Crosby N, Boggs J. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;44(6):637-645. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100109. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
PMID: 30954936BACKGROUNDGilmore CA, Ilfeld BM, Rosenow JM, Li S, Desai MJ, Hunter CW, Rauck RL, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen SP, Crosby ND, Boggs JW. Percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation implant provides sustained relief of chronic pain following amputation: 12-month follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Nov 17:rapm-2019-100937. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100937. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 31740443BACKGROUNDCleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PMID: 8080219BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
PMID: 18055266BACKGROUNDLinacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32.
PMID: 8311667BACKGROUNDAnagnostis C, Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142221.88111.0f.
PMID: 15480144BACKGROUNDMassarweh NN, Kaji AH, Itani KMF. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP). JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):768-769. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0504. No abstract available.
PMID: 29617543BACKGROUNDDeer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R; Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208.
PMID: 25112889BACKGROUNDDeer TR, Naidu R, Strand N, Sparks D, Abd-Elsayed A, Kalia H, Hah JM, Mehta P, Sayed D, Gulati A. A review of the bioelectronic implications of stimulation of the peripheral nervous system for chronic pain conditions. Bioelectron Med. 2020 Apr 24;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s42234-020-00045-5. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32346553BACKGROUNDRauck RL, Cohen SP, Gilmore CA, North JM, Kapural L, Zang RH, Grill JH, Boggs JW. Treatment of post-amputation pain with peripheral nerve stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2014 Feb;17(2):188-97. doi: 10.1111/ner.12102. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
PMID: 23947830BACKGROUNDBruce J, Quinlan J. Chronic Post Surgical Pain. Rev Pain. 2011 Sep;5(3):23-9. doi: 10.1177/204946371100500306.
PMID: 26526062BACKGROUNDImani F. Postoperative pain management. Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul;1(1):6-7. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.1810. Epub 2011 Jul 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 25729647BACKGROUNDBorghi B, D'Addabbo M, White PF, Gallerani P, Toccaceli L, Raffaeli W, Tognu A, Fabbri N, Mercuri M. The use of prolonged peripheral neural blockade after lower extremity amputation: the effect on symptoms associated with phantom limb syndrome. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1308-15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4e848. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
PMID: 20881281BACKGROUNDColumbo JA, Davies L, Kang R, Barnes JA, Leinweber KA, Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Stone DH. Patient Experience of Recovery After Major Leg Amputation for Arterial Disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 May;52(4):262-268. doi: 10.1177/1538574418761984. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
PMID: 29495957BACKGROUNDHoughton AD, Nicholls G, Houghton AL, Saadah E, McColl L. Phantom pain: natural history and association with rehabilitation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):22-5.
PMID: 8117013BACKGROUNDGallagher P, Allen D, Maclachlan M. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: a descriptive analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Aug 15;23(12):522-30. doi: 10.1080/09638280010029859.
PMID: 11432649BACKGROUNDRaichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, Ehde D, Smith DG. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(7):961-72. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0151.
PMID: 19165686BACKGROUNDArmaghani SJ, Lee DS, Bible JE, Archer KR, Shau DN, Kay H, Zhang C, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ. Preoperative opioid use and its association with perioperative opioid demand and postoperative opioid independence in patients undergoing spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):E1524-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000622.
PMID: 25417827BACKGROUNDSmith SR, Bido J, Collins JE, Yang H, Katz JN, Losina E. Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):803-808. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01200.
PMID: 28509820BACKGROUNDAlbright-Trainer B, Phan T, Trainer RJ, Crosby ND, Murphy DP, Disalvo P, Amendola M, Lester DD. Peripheral nerve stimulation for the management of acute and subacute post-amputation pain: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial. Pain Manag. 2022 Apr;12(3):357-369. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0087. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
PMID: 34761694DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Several participants underwent unanticipated amputation revisions, which has the potential to contribute to worsening pain and the need for increased opioids, which may significantly confound results. Subjects were instructed to use the device continuously, and the effects of PNS therapy may be impacted by the number of hours the device was utilized by the patient. Variations in subject compliance with device usage may impact outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Denise Lester
- Organization
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denise Lester, MD
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2018
First Posted
March 30, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 17, 2021
Study Completion
April 17, 2021
Last Updated
July 21, 2021
Results First Posted
July 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06