The Chocolate Touch Study
A Randomized Trial to Confirm the Safety and Effectiveness of Chocolate Touch™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter, in Above the Knee Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
333
4 countries
20
Brief Summary
The Chocolate Touch study is a randomized, multi-center, prospective, adaptive study, designed to show sufficient safety and effectiveness of the Chocolate Touch™ for use in superficial femoral or popliteal arteries with the intention of obtaining regulatory approval to market this device in the United States
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedOctober 30, 2023
October 1, 2023
7.9 years
October 3, 2016
October 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
True Drug Coated Balloon Success
A composite endpoint that requires patients to achieve Primary Patency (Peak systolic velocity ratio \<2.4 without the need for clinically driven target lesion revascularization) in the absence of a clinically driven bail-out stent (core lab adjudicated).
12 months
Freedom from Major Adverse Events
Composite of target-limb-related death, major amputation of the target limb, and clinically driven re-intervention of the target limb.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
By Angiographic Core Lab Review (Acute)
1 hour
By Duplex Ultrasound Core Lab Review
6, 12, 24, & 36 months
By Clinical Assessment
6, 12, 24, & 36 months
Study Arms (2)
Test Group (Chocolate Touch)
EXPERIMENTAL* The diameter of the Chocolate Touch should correspond to the diameter of the vessel for treatment with a balloon to artery ratio of 1.1:1. * The Chocolate Touch must be inflated to at least nominal pressure. Maintain balloon inflation for a minimum of 2 minutes. The balloon may be inflated as long as required to achieve optimal angioplasty outcome. * If delivery is attempted and failed, a new Chocolate Touch should be used for subsequent attempts after pre-dilatation.
Control Group (Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Never inflate the Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon (DCB)prior to reaching the target lesion. * The Lutonix® Catheter should be advanced to the target site as fast as possible (i.e. 30 seconds) and immediately inflated to appropriate pressure to ensure full wall apposition (balloon to artery ratio of \>1:1). * If the deployment of the Lutonix® Catheter exceeds 3 minutes, the catheter requires placement with a new unit. * Maintain balloon inflation for a minimum of 2 minutes (120 seconds). The balloon may be inflated as long as required by standard of care to achieve a good angioplasty outcome.
Interventions
The Chocolate Touch™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter is indicated for balloon dilatation, after appropriate vessel preparation as needed, of lesions in native superficial femoral or popliteal arteries up to 18 cm in length that are appropriate for angioplasty with balloon diameters from 3.5 mm to 6.0mm.
The Lutonix® 035 Drug Coated Balloon Catheter is indicated for improving luminal diameter for the treatment of obstructive de novo or non-stented restenotic lesions (≤ 18 cm in length) in native femoropopliteal arteries having reference vessel diameters of 4 mm to 6 mm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General:
- Minimum of 18 years of age
- Intermittent claudication or ischemic rest pain (Rutherford 2-4)
- Life Expectancy \>2 years
- Patient has agreed to follow-up requirements and given informed consent
- Angiographic:
- Lesion successfully crossed with a guidewire
- Lesion in the SFA or popliteal artery defined as a lesion with a proximal origin \>10 mm from SFA origin (deep femoral artery) and a distal end above the knee joint (at least 3 cm above bottom of the femur - P1).
- Target Lesion ≥70% stenosis in the SFA or popliteal arteries
- Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) between 4.0 \& 6.0mm and within treatment range of Chocolate Touch to be used 1.1:1 at the Target Lesion
- Target Lesion ≤180mm that consists of no more than two adjacent lesions (≤ 25mm apart) and is able to be completely covered with inflation of no more than two assigned balloons (with minimum of \>5mm overlap to the area covered by the first balloon). (Note: Adjacent or tandem target lesions must be treated as a single lesion.)
- Angiographic evidence of distal run-off demonstrated by at least one patent tibial vessel without evidence of significant (≥70%) stenosis from origin to ankle
- In-flow vessel without significant stenosis (≥70%) or successful treatment (≤30% residual stenosis with no complications) of a diseased vessel. Note: treatment of contralateral iliac is permissible.
You may not qualify if:
- General:
- Acute limb ischemia, or patient indicated for thrombolytic therapy
- Planned surgical or interventional procedures within 30 days after study procedure.
- Non-target lesion concurrent interventions involving a re-entry device, atherectomy, laser, or ablation procedures, the use of a drug eluting stent, or, treatment with any other drug coated balloon.
- Myocardial infarction or stroke within 30 days prior to the procedure
- Known intolerance to required medications, contrast media that cannot be adequately premedicated, nitinol, or Paclitaxel
- Known impaired Renal Function that could have an impact on contrast tolerance with GFR ≤ 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and/or elevated serum creatinine \>2.5mg/dL (220µmol/L) or on dialysis.
- Known bleeding disorder, or on dialysis, or uncontrolled hypercoagulable disorder
- Non-atherosclerotic lesion (e.g. vasculitis or Berger's disease)
- Female who is pregnant or intends to be pregnant during study
- Patient is enrolled in another investigational clinical study or was previously enrolled in this study
- Angiographic:
- Presence of perforation, dissection (Type D or worse) or other injury in target vessel at time of enrollment
- Severe Calcification at the target lesion (defined as angiographic evidence of dense calcification present on both sides of the vessel wall on two orthogonal views and that extends \>50 continuous mm in length).
- Previous bypass graft, stent at target vessel (must be greater than 20mm from target lesion), or iliac stent that cannot permit crossing by the treatment balloon within the introducer sheath (Note: In-stent restenosis is not allowed.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (20)
Cardiac and Vascular Institute
Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States
Mt. Sinai - Miami
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Houma, Louisiana, 70360, United States
Michigan Outpaitient Vascular Institution
Dearborn, Michigan, 48126, United States
Jackson Heart
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
St. Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
Mt. Sinai Heart
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Columbia University Medical Center / NewYork Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Univeristy Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011, United States
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043, United States
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States
MIssion Research
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Medical University of Graz - LKH Univ.-Klinikum Graz
Graz, A-0836, Austria
Angiologie - Hansuchkrankenhaus
Vienna, 1140, Austria
Universitat Herz-Zentrum
Bad Krozingen, Germany
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, 3210, New Zealand
Related Publications (16)
Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):738-43. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137913.26087.F0. Epub 2004 Jul 19.
PMID: 15262830BACKGROUNDHirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, Krook SH, Hunninghake DB, Comerota AJ, Walsh ME, McDermott MM, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1317-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1317.
PMID: 11560536BACKGROUNDNorgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG; TASC II Working Group; Bell K, Caporusso J, Durand-Zaleski I, Komori K, Lammer J, Liapis C, Novo S, Razavi M, Robbs J, Schaper N, Shigematsu H, Sapoval M, White C, White J, Clement D, Creager M, Jaff M, Mohler E 3rd, Rutherford RB, Sheehan P, Sillesen H, Rosenfield K. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33 Suppl 1:S1-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.024. Epub 2006 Nov 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 17140820BACKGROUNDHirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B; American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):e463-654. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174526. No abstract available.
PMID: 16549646BACKGROUNDScheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
PMID: 17101615BACKGROUNDTepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, Heller S, Schwarzwalder U, Beregi JP, Claussen CD, Oldenburg A, Scheller B, Speck U. Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):689-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706356.
PMID: 18272892BACKGROUNDWerk M, Langner S, Reinkensmeier B, Boettcher HF, Tepe G, Dietz U, Hosten N, Hamm B, Speck U, Ricke J. Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial. Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1358-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735985. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
PMID: 18779447BACKGROUNDScheinert D, Duda S, Zeller T, Krankenberg H, Ricke J, Bosiers M, Tepe G, Naisbitt S, Rosenfield K. The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.022.
PMID: 24456716BACKGROUNDSchmidt A, Piorkowski M, Werner M, Ulrich M, Bausback Y, Braunlich S, Ick H, Schuster J, Botsios S, Kruse HJ, Varcoe RL, Scheinert D. First experience with drug-eluting balloons in infrapopliteal arteries: restenosis rate and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.034.
PMID: 21884945BACKGROUNDWerk M, Albrecht T, Meyer DR, Ahmed MN, Behne A, Dietz U, Eschenbach G, Hartmann H, Lange C, Schnorr B, Stiepani H, Zoccai GB, Hanninen EL. Paclitaxel-coated balloons reduce restenosis after femoro-popliteal angioplasty: evidence from the randomized PACIFIER trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec;5(6):831-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971630. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
PMID: 23192918BACKGROUNDSchnorr B, Kelsch B, Cremers B, Clever YP, Speck U, Scheller B. Paclitaxel-coated balloons - Survey of preclinical data. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2010 Oct;58(5):567-82.
PMID: 20948503BACKGROUNDSchnorr B, Speck U, Scheller B. Review of clinical data with Paccocath- coated balloon catheters. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011 Oct;59(5):431-45.
PMID: 21983304BACKGROUNDZeller T, Schmitmeier S, Tepe G, Rastan A. Drug-coated balloons in the lower limb. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2011 Apr;52(2):235-43.
PMID: 21460774BACKGROUNDMorikawa T, Yoshida M. A useful testing strategy in phase III trials: combined test of superiority and test of equivalence. J Biopharm Stat. 1995 Nov;5(3):297-306. doi: 10.1080/10543409508835115.
PMID: 8580930BACKGROUNDShishehbor MH, Zeller T, Werner M, Brodmann M, Parise H, Holden A, Lichtenberg M, Parikh SA, Kashyap VS, Pietras C, Tirziu D, Ardakani S, Beschorner U, Krishnan P, Niazi KA, Wali AU, Lansky AJ. Randomized Trial of Chocolate Touch Compared With Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Lesions (Chocolate Touch Study). Circulation. 2022 May 31;145(22):1645-1654. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059646. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
PMID: 35377157BACKGROUNDBohme T, Zeller T, Shishehbor MH, Werner M, Brodmann M, Parise H, Holden A, Lichtenberg M, Parikh SA, Kashyap VS, Pietras C, Tirziu D, Beschorner U, Krishnan P, Niazi KA, Wali AU, Lansky AJ. Chocolate Touch Versus Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions in Diabetes: The Chocolate Touch Study. J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr;32(2):414-422. doi: 10.1177/15266028231179589. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PMID: 37314243BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mehdi Shishehbor, DO
Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Zeller, MD
Universitat Herzzentrum, Bad Krozingen, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2016
First Posted
October 5, 2016
Study Start
July 26, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share