Evaluation of the Risk of Hyperoxia-induced Hypercapnia in Obese Cardiac Surgery Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients. It will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) : manual titration of oxygen delivery for a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) target of \> or = 95 % versus automatic titration by a closed-loop system for a SpO2 target of 90%. 15 post-op obese cardiac surgery patients will be recruited and each will receive both interventions (cross-over design). The main outcome will be the PaCO2, which will be compared after each study period. The research hypothesis is that the usual SpO2 target of \> or = 95 % is associated with a greater PaCO2 compared with a lesser SpO2 target of 90%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2018
CompletedMay 11, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.4 years
September 25, 2016
May 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in PaCO2
Difference in end-of-period PaCO2 on arterial blood gas
At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Difference in pH
At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in PaO2
At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2 < 88%)
In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 85 %)
In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO2 > 96 %)
In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15 patients who will receive usual care for 30 minutes and then switch to FreeO2 for another 30 minutes
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15 patients who will be oxygenated by FreeO2 for 30 minutes and then switch to usual care for another 30 minutes
Interventions
Oxygen delivery automatically titrated by a closed-loop system that adjusts the oxygen flow based on the patient's real-time SpO2 and a programed SpO2 target of 90 %
Oxygen delivery manually titrated by the nursing staff for a SpO2 target of \> or = 95 %
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI \> 30 kg/m2
- SpO2 \> or = 95 % before extubation
- Procedure : coronary artery bypass
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbidities : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, restrictive syndrome not associated with obesity (pulmonary fibrosis, neuromuscular junction disease, etc.)
- Obstructive sleep apnea requiring a positive-pressure mask in the posteoperative period
- FreeO2 device unavailable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, G1V4G5, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Beasley R, Chien J, Douglas J, Eastlake L, Farah C, King G, Moore R, Pilcher J, Richards M, Smith S, Walters H. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand oxygen guidelines for acute oxygen use in adults: 'Swimming between the flags'. Respirology. 2015 Nov;20(8):1182-91. doi: 10.1111/resp.12620.
PMID: 26486092BACKGROUNDO'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG; British Thoracic Society. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008 Oct;63 Suppl 6:vi1-68. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.102947. No abstract available.
PMID: 18838559BACKGROUNDLellouche F, L'her E. Automated oxygen flow titration to maintain constant oxygenation. Respir Care. 2012 Aug;57(8):1254-62. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01343. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
PMID: 22348812BACKGROUNDDenault MH, Ruel C, Simon M, Bouchard PA, Simard S, Lellouche F. Evaluation of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in obese patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized crossover comparison of conservative and liberal oxygen administration. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;67(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01500-x. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
PMID: 31650500DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
François Lellouche, MD, PhD
Laval University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2016
First Posted
September 28, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 8, 2018
Study Completion
January 8, 2018
Last Updated
May 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The investigators would like to publish our results in scientific magazine and/or present them in a Conference.