Electromyographic Assessment of the TetraGraph in Normal Volunteers
1 other identifier
observational
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is an urgent need for an easy-to-use and accurate quantitative neuromuscular monitor in the clinical setting. The aim of this clinical investigation is to examine a prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet most, if not all, of the clinical requirements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedMay 17, 2023
July 1, 2018
1.5 years
September 21, 2016
May 16, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of train of four measurements between TOF Watch and TetraGraph
The primary endpoint will be an analysis of the agreement between the TOF-Watch (the current gold standard) and TetraGraphTM devices during neuromuscular monitoring. Data Acceleromyography (AMG) and Electromyography (EMG) will be compared between the two devices during testing of single twitch (ST) and train of four (TOF) patterns at varying current amplitudes, from threshold amplitude (the lowest current amplitude that is able to generate a muscle response), to supramaximal current amplitude (the amplitude that elicits maximal muscle response). Bias and limits of agreement will be calculated for each stimulation pattern (ST and TOF) at currents between submaximal and supramaximal amplitude. Measured responses obtained with the two technologies (AMG and EMG) will be compared.
During stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Noise level
During stimulation
Stimulus artifact
During stimulation
Appearance EMG response
During stimulation
EMG amplitude
During stimulation
Maximal EMG amplitude
During stimulation
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
A sequence of 3 sets of Train of four (TOF) stimuli delivered (every 20 sec) at the pre-determined current amplitude (for instance, 40 mA, then 30 mA, then 50 mA, then 20 mA).
A sequence of 3 sets of TOF stimuli delivered (every 20 sec) at the pre-determined current amplitude (for instance, 40 mA, then 30 mA, then 50 mA, then 20 mA).
Eligibility Criteria
The study population for this study is normal, healthy, unpremedicated human volunteers.
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Volunteer meets the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III criteria
- Volunteer has provided verbal informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease
- Use of medications known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission
- Volunteer has open sores/rashes at the locations needed for electrode application
- Volunteer does not tolerate a trial electrical stimulation comfortably.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2016
First Posted
September 23, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2018-07