NCT02912039

Brief Summary

There is an urgent need for an easy-to-use and accurate quantitative neuromuscular monitor in the clinical setting. The aim of this clinical investigation is to examine a prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet most, if not all, of the clinical requirements.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

September 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of train of four measurements between TOF Watch and TetraGraph

    The primary endpoint will be an analysis of the agreement between the TOF-Watch (the current gold standard) and TetraGraphTM devices during neuromuscular monitoring. Data Acceleromyography (AMG) and Electromyography (EMG) will be compared between the two devices during testing of single twitch (ST) and train of four (TOF) patterns at varying current amplitudes, from threshold amplitude (the lowest current amplitude that is able to generate a muscle response), to supramaximal current amplitude (the amplitude that elicits maximal muscle response). Bias and limits of agreement will be calculated for each stimulation pattern (ST and TOF) at currents between submaximal and supramaximal amplitude. Measured responses obtained with the two technologies (AMG and EMG) will be compared.

    During stimulation

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Noise level

    During stimulation

  • Stimulus artifact

    During stimulation

  • Appearance EMG response

    During stimulation

  • EMG amplitude

    During stimulation

  • Maximal EMG amplitude

    During stimulation

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

A sequence of 3 sets of Train of four (TOF) stimuli delivered (every 20 sec) at the pre-determined current amplitude (for instance, 40 mA, then 30 mA, then 50 mA, then 20 mA).

TOF WatchDEVICE

A sequence of 3 sets of TOF stimuli delivered (every 20 sec) at the pre-determined current amplitude (for instance, 40 mA, then 30 mA, then 50 mA, then 20 mA).

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population for this study is normal, healthy, unpremedicated human volunteers.

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Volunteer meets the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III criteria
  • Volunteer has provided verbal informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease
  • Use of medications known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission
  • Volunteer has open sores/rashes at the locations needed for electrode application
  • Volunteer does not tolerate a trial electrical stimulation comfortably.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2016

First Posted

September 23, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations