Neurostimulation and Electromyographic Assessment of the TetraGraph (NEAT) In Patients (NEAT-3)
NEAT-3
3 other identifiers
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
TetraGraph is a newly developed EMG-based, quantitative, battery-powered neuromuscular monitoring system intended for daily clinical use. The primary aim of this clinical investigation is to examine the applicability (ease of use, equipment need, etc.), repeatability (precision or internal consistency) and performance (signal quality, accuracy of outcome, voltage of stimulation output before and during a stimulus) of the Tetragraph device in patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring neuromuscular blockade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 28, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.4 years
July 8, 2014
January 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary performance assessment of TetraGraph device
The primary objective of this study is to provide safety \& performance data of the TetraGraph device in anesthetized patients. Performance will be assessed post hoc by analyzing objective EMG data from the SD card and correlating the responses to annotations made during the surgical procedure (e.g., correlating the EMG responses to the time of NMBA or reversal agent administration). No clinical decisions will be made based on any objective measurements made by the TetraGraph. There are no specific timepoints concerning the primary outcome measure of the study.
participants will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay, an expected avarage of five days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Secondary performance assessment of TetraGraph Device
participants will be followed for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected avarage of 5 days
Safety of TetraGraph device
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected avarage of 5 days
Study Arms (1)
Elective surgery with muscle relaxation
ASA I-II-III patients. Fentanyl (2-3 ug/kg) - Propofol (2 mg/kg) induction, sevoflurane anesthesia, type and dose of muscle relaxant up to the decision of attending anesthetist. Neuromuscular stimulation with TetraGraph (30mA current intensity, 0.2 msce pulse duration, 20 sec intervals)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring muscle relaxation
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III criteria (Table I).
- Subject has provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease.
- Presence of renal or hepatic disease.
- Subject has open skin sores in the locations needed for electrode application (forearms).
- Patient is taking anti-seizure medication
- Patient is taking oral anti-cholinesterase (e.g., therapy for myasthenia gravis)
- Magnesium sulfate administration is required
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Debrecen
Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
Related Publications (1)
1. Gätke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, Jensen FS, Skovgaard LT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:207-13. 2. Berg H, Viby-Mogensen J, Roed J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Krintel JJ. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1095-103. 3. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Anesth Analg 2008;107:130-7. 4. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS, Nisman M. Anesthesiology 2008;109:389-98. 5. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. Anesthesiology 2011;115:946-54. 6. Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Anesth Analg 2010;111:120-8. 7. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Can J Anesth 2007;54: 58-72. 8. Gätke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, Jensen FS, Skovgaard LT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 207-13. 9. Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Anesth Analg 1993;77:352-5. 10. Grayling M, Sweeney BP. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:806-9. 11. Liang SS, Stewart PA, Phillips S. Anesth Analg 2013;117:373-9.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bela Fulesdi, MD,PhD,DSci
UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN FACULTY OF MEDICINE Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PHD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2014
First Posted
September 16, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01