Metabolic and Neurofunctional Responses to Breakfasts
Effect of Glucose Versus Mixed Breakfast on Metabolic and Neurofunctional Responses in Healthy Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims at assessing the effects of glucose and different types of breakfast on metabolic and neurofunctional responses in healthy individuals. Twelve healthy subjects, on a stable diet, in a randomized-crossover fashion, received either a 50 g glucose load (control) or one of these breakfast: B1: milk (125ml) and cereals (30g); B2: milk (220ml), apple (200g) and cream chocolate filled sponge cake (30g); B3: milk (125ml), bread (50g), apple (150g) and hazelnut cream chocolate (15g). Prior and upon completion of each tolerance test, an EEG was performed to measure frontal P300-evoked potentials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedSeptember 14, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.2 years
August 26, 2016
September 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of glucose vs different kind of breakfasts on cognitive performances via brain evoked-potentials measure
On the same morning of the glucose tolerance test, before and 180 min after consumption, an EEG was performed to record P300 wave-evoked potentials.
The incremental (post-pre) frontal P300 potential was assessed as a "change" ( before and 180 min after consumption)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Effect of glucose vs different kind of breakfasts on AUC_glycemia in healthy subjects
Blood samples are drawn at -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 minutes with respect to the ingestion.
Effect of glucose vs different kind of breakfasts on AUC_ghrelinemia in healthy subjects.
Blood samples are drawn at -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 minutes with respect to the ingestion.
Effect of glucose vs different kind of breakfasts on AUC_insulinemia in healthy subjects.
Blood samples are drawn at -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 minutes with respect to the ingestion.
Study Arms (4)
Glucose
ACTIVE COMPARATOREEG\_pre + Oral glucose tolerance test (50-g OGTT) + EEG\_post
Milk + Cereals
EXPERIMENTALEEG\_pre + B1: milk (125ml) and cereals (30g) + EEG\_post
Milk + Apple + Snack
EXPERIMENTALEEG\_pre + B2: milk (220ml), apple (200g) and cream chocolate filled sponge cake (30g) + EEG\_post
Milk + Apple + Bread w/ cream
EXPERIMENTALEEG\_pre + B3: milk (125ml), apple (150g), and bread (50g) with hazelnut chocolate cream (15g) + EEG\_post
Interventions
50g of glucose dissolved in 250 to 300ml of water was drunk. Prior and upon completion of each glucose tolerance test, an EEG was performed.
A breakfast (B1) including a glass of milk (125ml) and 30 g-corn flakes was consumed. Prior and upon completion of each tolerance test, an EEG was performed
A breakfast (B2) including a glass of milk (220ml), an apple (200g), a cream chocolate filled sponge cake (30g) was consumed. Prior and upon completion of each meal tolerance test, an EEG was performed.
A breakfast (B3) including a glass of milk (125ml), an apple (150g), bread (50g, hazelnut chocolate cream (15g) was consumed. Prior and upon completion of each meal tolerance test, an EEG was performed.
Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed prior each tolerance test to assess frontal P300-evoked potentials
Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed upon completion of each tolerance test to assess frontal P300-evoked potentials
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2
- normal glucose tolerance
- stable diet
You may not qualify if:
- type 1 and type 2 diabetes
- impaired glucose tolerance
- dyslipidemia
- metabolic syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ospedale San Donatolead
- Soremartec Italia S.r.l.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
San Donato Hospital
San Donato Milanese, MI, 20097, Italy
Related Publications (5)
Barclay AW, Brand-Miller JC, Wolever TM. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and glycemic response are not the same. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jul;28(7):1839-40. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1839. No abstract available.
PMID: 15983358BACKGROUNDFranz MJ. The glycemic index: not the most effective nutrition therapy intervention. Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2466-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2466. No abstract available.
PMID: 12882880BACKGROUNDEsposito K, Giugliano D. Low-glycemic load diet and resting energy expenditure. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1189; auhor reply 1189-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1189-a. No abstract available.
PMID: 15755939BACKGROUNDBenedini S, Codella R, Caumo A, Marangoni F, Luzi L. Different circulating ghrelin responses to isoglucidic snack food in healthy individuals. Horm Metab Res. 2011 Feb;43(2):135-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1269900. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
PMID: 21225542BACKGROUNDCummings DE, Purnell JQ, Frayo RS, Schmidova K, Wisse BE, Weigle DS. A preprandial rise in plasma ghrelin levels suggests a role in meal initiation in humans. Diabetes. 2001 Aug;50(8):1714-9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1714.
PMID: 11473029BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2016
First Posted
September 13, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09