The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Fusion The IVANOS-study
IVANOS
RCT Comparing i-FACTOR and Allograft in Spinal Fusion Surgery
2 other identifiers
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudicatio(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc. Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation. Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended. The investigators want to se whether i-FACTOR improves clinical outcomes compared to using allograft in spinal fusion in the elderly, and thereby find an improved methods operating this difficult patient population. The hypothesis is, that there is no difference in clinical outcomes whether you use i-FACTOR or allograft i non-instrumented spinal fusion surgery in patients with spinal stenosis due to degenerative listhesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedApril 19, 2024
November 1, 2018
8.5 years
June 24, 2013
April 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry disability index
questionnaire
At 60 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Dallas pain questionnaire
At 24 months
Walking distance
At 24 months
EQ5D
At 60 months
SF-36
At 60 months
Fusion status yes/no
At 60 months
Study Arms (2)
Allograft group, standard treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group, standard treatment. Approx 50 g pr level fused.
i-FACTOR
EXPERIMENTALi-FACTOR putty in the operation site. Fda approved. Approx 5 ml pr level fused.
Interventions
Between 5-10 CC i-FACTOR putty mixed with local harvested autograft pr level spondylodesis compared to 30 grams of allograft pr level mixed with local harvested allograft.
Approx 50 g of allograft bone in the fused site
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal stenosis, listhesis grade 1-2 (\>3 mm), facet joint arthrosis and flavum hypertrophia verified by a mr-scan and x-ray including maximally 2 levels ranging from L1-S1.
- A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
- Signed informed content.
You may not qualify if:
- Any disease demanding obligate thromboprophylaxis treatment, including mechanical valve, (DVT with cancer/thrombophilia, AMI, apoplexia cerebri, TCI, valve-operation)\< 3 months, coronar metal stent \< 6 weeks and coronar drug eluted/coated stent \< 12 months.
- Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valve prothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
- Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age \> 75 years, EF \< 35 %.
- Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
- Ongoing chemotherapy.
- Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
- Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
- Dementia assessed by the MMSE
- ASA 3+4
- Age below 60 years.
- Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
- The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
- Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
- Haematologic disease. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmarklead
- Ortotechcollaborator
- CeraPedics, Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Middelfart spine surgery research department
Middelfart, 5500, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mikkel Andersen, MD
Department of spine surgery of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2013
First Posted
September 9, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2018-11