The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Spondylodesis Operation in the Elderly With Spinal Stenosis Due to Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
IVANOS
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudication(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavus, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc. Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation. Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.(Ausman). Clinical improvement including decrease of pain, improved ADL-function and an increased quality of life are parameters of highest interest and the purpose of an operation is clear: Making sufficient room for the affected nerves. In addition fusion is desired achieving stability avoiding a new compression of the nerves. Studies attending these issues find a correlation between fusion and clinical outcome, why obtained fusion of the affected levels are very important(Andersen et al.;Andersen et al.;Girardo et al.;Kornblum MB FAU - Fischgrund et al.). P-15, bound to Anorganisk Bone Mineral (ABM), called i-FACTOR®, shows fusion superiority, no side effects and no risk of transferring disease(Thorwarth et al. 5648-57;Thorwarth et al. 789-95;Wenz, Oesch, and Horst 1599-606;Scarano et al. 318-24;Kubler et al. 171-79) why the investigators find this material suited for fusion surgery in the elderly. To the investigators knowledge this is the first prospective study comparing fusion rates and postoperative clinic with i-FACTOR vs allograft in older patients operated with decompression and spondylodesis because of spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis. Hypothesis: There are no difference in the clinical parameters measured by ODI and fusion rates comparing i-FACTOR® and allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis-operations in patients 60 years and older.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 7, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.3 years
May 8, 2012
September 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The clinical effect of i-FACTOR® versus allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis operation in the elderly with spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis measured by ODI
24 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The clinical effect of i-FACTOR® versus allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis operation in the elderly with spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis assessed by fusion rates
12 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Fusion, allograft
ACTIVE COMPARATORAllograft used for fusion in the operation site
Fusion, i-FACTOR
EXPERIMENTALi-FACTOR used for fusion in the operation site
Interventions
i-FACTOR mixed with autologous bone from the decompression placed in the operation site for enhancing fusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal stenosis, olisthesis grade 1-2 (\>3 mm), facet joint arthrosis and flavus hypertrophia verified by a mr-scan and x-ray including maximally 2 levels ranging from L1-S1.
- A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
- Signed informed content.
You may not qualify if:
- Any disease demanding obligate thromboprophylaxis treatment, including mechanical valve, (DVT with cancer/thrombophilia, AMI, apoplexia cerebri, TCI, valve-operation)\< 3 months, coronar metal stent \< 6 weeks and coronar drug eluted/coated stent \< 12 months.
- Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valveprothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
- Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age \> 75 years, EF \< 35 %.
- Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
- Ongoing chemotherapy.
- Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
- Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
- Dementia assessed by the MMSE
- ASA 3+4
- Age below 60 years.
- Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
- The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
- Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
- Haematologic disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sygehus Lillebaeltlead
- CeraPedics, Inccollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Sygehuslillebaelt
Middelfart, DK, 5500, Denmark
Rygkirurgisk sektor Middelfart
Middelfart, Region Syddanmark, 5500, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael K Jacobsen, MD
Rygkirurgisk sektor Middelfart
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2012
First Posted
June 13, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09