NCT05115227

Brief Summary

Long-term approaches are challenging to implement within the current care system, which rewards clinicians for attempting to quick-fix a long-term condition. This results in increased inappropriate imaging, opioid prescriptions, surgery, and visits/rehabilitation in secondary care, leading to higher societal costs and the continuing increase of LBP-related disability that is currently observed. The investigators argue that LBP management can be optimized by providing patients with self-management strategies supported by a multidisciplinary team and providing simple, safe, and low-cost interventions that adhere to clinical guidelines. This has the potential to change patient behaviors and facilitate empowerment to self-manage LBP leading to lower societal costs of LBP. Research objectives The investigators will develop and test a long-term supportive multidisciplinary team-based management strategy with a specific focus on communicating a structured and unchanging message about individualized diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, focusing on conducting a large randomized controlled trial as the next phase. This feasibility trial will be completed in a secondary care settings, where relevant patients with poor management skills and insufficient effects of usual (primary) care management can be identified. The specific objectives are: (I) To develop a long-term supportive multidisciplinary team-based management strategy for secondary-care low back pain patients (II) To test the feasibility by assessing:

  • Changes in relevant outcomes
  • Utilization of Primary care
  • Patients and clinicians experience with the intervention
  • Practical challenges of the setting The management strategy development follows the principles provided by the Medical Research Council for developing complex interventions. Development of the framework Step 1: Framework setup The investigators constructed a basic framework for the intervention by reviewing relevant systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. The research group determined the initial management intervention. Afterward, the investigators conducted a small survey on 191 participants (11% of the total sample of patients between February and May 2021), about their interest in participating. The majority would find such an approach of interest (147(77%)). In parallel, the investigators conducted short semi-structured interviews concerning the intervention with a convenient sample of 20 patients. Seventeen provided usable data. Step 2 - Development Using the participants' information, the investigators re-framed the management strategy. Subsequent semi-structured focus-group interviews with a clinical panel for further modifications before testing was conducted. Step 3 - Feasibility The multidisciplinary team for the feasibility trial consists of two coordinators (chiropractors), two therapists (physical therapists), one medical doctor, and one nurse. The feasibility trial aims to identify and develop the appropriate framework by: I) Investigating the patients' experiences of the current management strategy II) Ensuring satisfactory work-relations between clinicians III) Determining the primary outcome IV) Mapping the multiple interacting components of the management strategy V) Investigating how to measure parallel use of primary care and how this could be applied in the trial evaluation VI) Estimating the workload (number of hours) of the clinicians VII) Quantifying any out-of-protocol behaviors by clinicians and patients alike VIII) Quantifying the different aspects of the intervention using the clinical records The feasibility trial will include 25 LBP patients from the Spine Centre willing to participate in a limited three-month follow-up. The intervention procedure is: 1\) A team meeting will be held each morning where the coordinator and the feasibility team will go through the patients. This will start the initial sparring process to ensure a structured and unchanging message for the patient. The coordinator will first assess each patient face-to-face according to ICD-10 principles and enroll eligible patients in the trial. Afterward, the therapist will evaluate the patient's current functional status and management strategy. During the three months, patients will have multiple encounters with the coordinator, the therapist, and the nurse, if needed. The therapist will provide further interventions (e.g., exercise and cognitive/behavioral therapy) to encourage self-management. The investigators will assess the following outcomes at three months: Disability (primary), pain, self-efficacy, quality of life, LBP trajectory, workability, and work retention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 10, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 13, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Disability

    The Oswestry disability index

    Changes in mean values from baseline to 3 months

Study Arms (1)

Multidisciplinary

EXPERIMENTAL

A pragmatic team-based management approach is individualized for each patient.

Behavioral: EducationBehavioral: Exercise

Interventions

EducationBEHAVIORAL

The team will educate the patient about low back pain and how this can be self-managed.

Also known as: Long-term team-based support
Multidisciplinary
ExerciseBEHAVIORAL

The team will advice the patient to conduct relevant exercises and to stay physical active.

Multidisciplinary

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to speak Danish
  • Disability score \> 40%
  • Duration of current episode \> 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgical candidate due to acute radiculopathy
  • Malignant or inflammatory back pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Middelfart, 5500, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

Educational StatusExercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Socioeconomic FactorsPopulation CharacteristicsMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Casper G Nim, PhD

    Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2021

First Posted

November 10, 2021

Study Start

November 10, 2021

Primary Completion

April 20, 2022

Study Completion

April 20, 2022

Last Updated

April 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We have no plans of sharing the individual participant data, as there is no available data for secondary analyses.

Locations