Metronomic Versus Conventional Chemotherapy in as Maintenance Treatment in mCRC
Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy Versus Conventional Chemotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The optimum regimen of maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unknown. This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedSeptember 16, 2016
September 1, 2016
2.2 years
September 3, 2016
September 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PFS1
from randomizing to progression
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
OS
20 months
QOL
20 months
Study Arms (2)
Metronomic
EXPERIMENTALaccept capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy (500mg, twice per day, everyday)
Conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORaccept capecitabine conventional chemotherapy (1000mg/m2, twice per day for 14 days, every 21 days)
Interventions
we are going to compare two maintenance treatment models with capecitabine in this study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
- Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
- Unidimensionally measurable disease (\> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or \> 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;
- In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment;
- Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases;
- Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
Related Publications (2)
Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FL, Erjavec Z, van der Torren AM, Tol J, Braun HJ, Nieboer P, van der Hoeven JJ, Haasjes JG, Jansen RL, Wals J, Cats A, Derleyn VA, Honkoop AH, Mol L, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 25862517BACKGROUNDLuo HY, Li YH, Wang W, Wang ZQ, Yuan X, Ma D, Wang FH, Zhang DS, Lin DR, Lin YC, Jia J, Hu XH, Peng JW, Xu RH. Single-agent capecitabine as maintenance therapy after induction of XELOX (or FOLFOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw101. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PMID: 26940686BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yifeng Wang, MD
Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2016
First Posted
September 8, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09