Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Progressive, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
Randomized Study of Second-Line Therapy Comprising Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Colorectal Cancer
4 other identifiers
interventional
78
1 country
23
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether irinotecan and capecitabine are more effective than irinotecan alone in treating colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying irinotecan and capecitabine to see how well they work as second-line therapy compared to irinotecan alone in treating older patients with progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedJuly 24, 2008
December 1, 2006
March 15, 2006
July 23, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Objective response
Stable disease rate
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Tolerability
Quality of life
Progression-free and overall survival
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (23)
Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville
Abbeville, 80101, France
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Boucher, 33300, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Pare - Boulogne
Boulogne, F-92104, France
Centre Hospitalier
Chalon-sur-Saône, F-71321, France
Hopital Antoine Beclere
Clamart, 92141, France
Hopital Du Bocage
Dijon, 21034, France
Clinique Pasteur
Guilherand-Granges, 07500, France
CMC Les Ormeaux
Le Havre, 76600, France
C. H. Du Mans
Le Mans, 72037, France
Hopital Robert Boulin
Libourne, 33500, France
Polyclinique des Quatre Pavillons
Lormont, 33310, France
CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source
Orléans, 45100, France
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015, France
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018, France
CHU Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651, France
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75674, France
Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan
Perpignan, 66046, France
Hopital Sebastopol, C.H.U. de Reims
Reims, 51092, France
Centre Eugene Marquis
Rennes, 35042, France
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031, France
C.H. Senlis
Senlis, 60309, France
CHRU de Tours - Hopital Trousseau
Tours, 37044, France
Centre Hospitalier General - St. Nicolas
Verdun, 55107, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
Emmanuel Mitry, MD, PhD
Hopital Ambroise Pare
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas Aparicio
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2006
First Posted
March 17, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Last Updated
July 24, 2008
Record last verified: 2006-12