HbA1c Variability in Type II Diabetes
Does Glycated Hemoglobin Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Differ Depending on the Diabetes Treatment Threshold Used in the Qatari Population: Implication on Diabetes Complication Risk?
3 other identifiers
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are numerous possible reasons why it could be speculated that HbA1c variability may affect complication risk. Of interest are the concepts that both laboratory and clinic evidence suggests that periods of sustained hyperglycemia are 'remembered' (metabolic memory), this in turn is recognized to place patients at greater long-term risk of complications. As such it can be speculated that the detrimental effect of variability in HbA1c may be mediated via the same mechanism as 'metabolic memory' phenomenon. Aims: To determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another and related to markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and microvascular complications. To determine whether a difference in HbA1c variability between the 2 groups will reflect in changes in small nerve fibers assessed with the sensitive method of corneal confocal microscopy and cardiac autonomic function testing. To assess the reproducibility of HbA1c measurement from a whole blood samples initially analyzed and then stored at -80C until the end of the study (2-3 years), as well as storing an aliquot of haemolysate, for reanalysis at the end of the study. In one arm the investigators will intensify treatment in those with FPG\>140mg/dl until their FPG is \<90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them, and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to \>140mg/dl again. In the other group the investigators will intensify if their FPG is \>115 mg/dl until it is \<=115 mg/dl and intensify further if \>115 mg/dl again. A total of 20 visits within a time frame of 2 and half years will be performed. Visits procedures will include routine biochemistry, eGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP. EPIC and G-PAQ questionnaires will be collected. Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy and a 24 hour urine collection for urinary isoprostanes to measure oxidative stress will be performed, at baseline, 12 and 24 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
ExpectedJuly 20, 2025
July 1, 2025
6.9 years
July 13, 2016
July 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Determination of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) between the 2 diabetes treatment thresholds
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another.
24-30 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to microvascular changes in heart rate variability, corneal nerve fiber density, albumin/creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
24-30 months
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to oxidative stress markers measured by urinary isoprostanes and inflammation measured by highly sensitive C-reactive protein.
24-30 months
Comparison of HbA1c (percent) for each subject at baseline and following sample storage of 2 years to assess HbA1c measurement stability.
2-3 years.
Study Arms (2)
Treatment arm 1
EXPERIMENTAL75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG \>140mg/dl Intervention: intensify treatment until their FBG is \<90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them using different interventions (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin), and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to \>140mg/dl again.
Treatment arm 2
EXPERIMENTAL75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG \>115mg/dl Intervention: intensify treatment until FBG is \<=115 mg/dl and intensify further if \>115 mg/dl again, using what ever clinical treatment is necessary (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin).
Interventions
Initial: 500 mg once daily; dosage may be increased by 500 mg weekly; maximum dose: 2,000 mg once daily
There is no fixed-dosage regimen for the management of diabetes mellitus with gliclazide. Dose will be individualized based on frequent determinations of blood glucose during dose titration and throughout maintenance. The 30 mg modified-release tablet equals the 80 mg immediate-release tablet. Immediate-release tablet: Initial: 80 mg twice daily; titrate based on blood glucose levels. Usual dosage range: 80 to 320 mg/day (maximum dose: 320 mg/day); dosage of ≥160 mg should be divided into 2 equal parts for twice-daily administration. Modified-release tablet: Initial: 30 mg once daily; titrate in 30 mg increments every 2 weeks based on blood glucose levels. Maximum dose: 120 mg once daily
SubQ: Initial: 0.6 mg once daily for 1 week; then increase to 1.2 mg once daily; may increase further to 1.8 mg once daily if optimal glycemic response not achieved with 1.2 mg daily.
Oral, Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15-30 mg once daily Patients with heart failure (NYHA Class I or II): Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15 mg once daily
5mg once daily increasing to 10mg once daily as required
insulin dosage and administration according to physician
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Qatari subjects only with type 2 diabetes taking any medication.
- HbA1c 7.5-9.0%.
- Body mass index 26-36.
- Age 18 - 65 years of age.
- Recruitment of a gender balance reflecting the local eligible diabetes patients until 150 are recruited.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with anemia or other conditions known to affect the validity of HbA1c measurement e.g. a haemoglobinopathy known to affect the Hamad HbA1c method or renal failure (CKD Stage 5)
- Patients with concurrent illness
- Patients on medication leading to insulin resistance e.g. corticosteroids
- Pregnancy
- Active retinopathy
- Hypoglycemic unawareness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatarlead
- Hamad Medical Corporationcollaborator
- Sidra Medicinecollaborator
- University of Hullcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hamad Medical Corporation
Doha, Qatar, 3050, Qatar
Related Publications (29)
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
PMID: 8366922BACKGROUNDKilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Effect of glucose variability on the long-term risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Oct;32(10):1901-3. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0109. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
PMID: 19549736BACKGROUNDSiegelaar SE, Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Glucose variability does not contribute to the development of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: data from the DCCT. Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1473-x. Epub 2009 Aug 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 19672575BACKGROUNDKilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jul;29(7):1486-90. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0293.
PMID: 16801566BACKGROUNDAction to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group; Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Bigger JT, Buse JB, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Grimm RH Jr, Probstfield JL, Simons-Morton DG, Friedewald WT. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18539917BACKGROUNDIntensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
PMID: 9742976BACKGROUNDEffect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65.
PMID: 9742977BACKGROUNDUK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13.
PMID: 9732337BACKGROUNDADVANCE Collaborative Group; Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, Woodward M, Marre M, Cooper M, Glasziou P, Grobbee D, Hamet P, Harrap S, Heller S, Liu L, Mancia G, Mogensen CE, Pan C, Poulter N, Rodgers A, Williams B, Bompoint S, de Galan BE, Joshi R, Travert F. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18539916BACKGROUNDDuckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, Zieve FJ, Marks J, Davis SN, Hayward R, Warren SR, Goldman S, McCarren M, Vitek ME, Henderson WG, Huang GD; VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
PMID: 19092145BACKGROUNDHome P. Contributions of basal and post-prandial hyperglycaemia to micro- and macrovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jul;21(7):989-98. doi: 10.1185/030079905x49662.
PMID: 16004665BACKGROUNDRaz I, Wilson PW, Strojek K, Kowalska I, Bozikov V, Gitt AK, Jermendy G, Campaigne BN, Kerr L, Milicevic Z, Jacober SJ. Effects of prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the HEART2D trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32(3):381-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1671.
PMID: 19246588BACKGROUNDKilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Mean blood glucose compared with HbA1c in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008 Feb;51(2):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0883-x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PMID: 18040661BACKGROUNDWaden J, Forsblom C, Thorn LM, Gordin D, Saraheimo M, Groop PH; Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. A1C variability predicts incident cardiovascular events, microalbuminuria, and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009 Nov;58(11):2649-55. doi: 10.2337/db09-0693. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
PMID: 19651819BACKGROUNDMarcovecchio ML, Tossavainen PH, Dunger DB. Status and rationale of renoprotection studies in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Aug;10(5):347-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00510.x. Epub 2009 Jun 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 19496962BACKGROUNDSugawara A, Kawai K, Motohashi S, Saito K, Kodama S, Yachi Y, Hirasawa R, Shimano H, Yamazaki K, Sone H. HbA(1c) variability and the development of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: Tsukuba Kawai Diabetes Registry 2. Diabetologia. 2012 Aug;55(8):2128-31. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2572-7. Epub 2012 May 12.
PMID: 22580991BACKGROUNDHirakawa Y, Arima H, Zoungas S, Ninomiya T, Cooper M, Hamet P, Mancia G, Poulter N, Harrap S, Woodward M, Chalmers J. Impact of visit-to-visit glycemic variability on the risks of macrovascular and microvascular events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2359-65. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0199. Epub 2014 May 8.
PMID: 24812434BACKGROUNDWriting Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2002 May 15;287(19):2563-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.19.2563.
PMID: 12020338BACKGROUNDHolman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Neil HA, Matthews DR. Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1565-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806359. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
PMID: 18784091BACKGROUNDIhnat MA, Thorpe JE, Ceriello A. Hypothesis: the 'metabolic memory', the new challenge of diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007 Jun;24(6):582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02138.x. Epub 2007 May 8.
PMID: 17490424BACKGROUNDMolitch ME, Steffes MW, Cleary PA, Nathan DM. Baseline analysis of renal function in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group [corrected]. Kidney Int. 1993 Mar;43(3):668-74. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.96.
PMID: 8455366BACKGROUNDStratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
PMID: 10938048BACKGROUNDMolyneaux LM, Constantino MI, McGill M, Zilkens R, Yue DK. Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in Type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998 Nov;42(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(98)00095-3.
PMID: 9886743BACKGROUNDDehghan M, Al Hamad N, Yusufali A, Nusrath F, Yusuf S, Merchant AT. Development of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in United Arab Emirates and Kuwait based on local foods. Nutr J. 2005 May 27;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-18.
PMID: 15921524BACKGROUNDAzmi S, Ferdousi M, Petropoulos IN, Ponirakis G, Fadavi H, Tavakoli M, Alam U, Jones W, Marshall A, Jeziorska M, Boulton AJ, Efron N, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy shows an improvement in small-fiber neuropathy in subjects with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with multiple daily injection. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):e3-4. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1698. No abstract available.
PMID: 25538321BACKGROUNDJayagopal V, Kilpatrick ES, Jennings PE, Holding S, Hepburn DA, Atkin SL. The biological variation of sex hormone-binding globulin in type 2 diabetes: implications for sex hormone-binding globulin as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):278-80. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.278. No abstract available.
PMID: 14694008BACKGROUNDSenn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703.
PMID: 7997705BACKGROUNDLancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
PMID: 15189396BACKGROUNDMatthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990 Jan 27;300(6719):230-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230.
PMID: 2106931BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rayaz Malik, MD PhD
Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is an randomized open label clinical trial.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2016
First Posted
August 25, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share