NCT02878447

Brief Summary

The sequelae of tuberculosis are still the commonest causes of haemoptysis in the developing world, where life-threatening haemoptysis remains a common and not infrequently fatal medical emergency. Haemoptysis can be life-threatening either as a result of compromised gas exchange or because of circulatory collapse secondary to acute blood loss. Haemodynamic and ventilatory support, followed by bronchial artery embolisation (BAE) as a bridge to potentially curative treatment such as lung resection, remains the standard of care. Often patients do not qualify for surgical intervention and BAE is, at best, a temporary solution. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) may be an alternative, curative intervention in the management of haemoptysis in patients with no alternative options. There is a paucity of studies reporting the use of EBRT in patients without malignancy and with regards to specific doses of EBRT. This pilot study aims to explore the potential of varying doses of EBRT in the management of massive haemoptysis.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2016

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 25, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

HaemoptysisRadiotherapyTuberculosisAspergillomaBronchiectasis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite end-point of time to recurrent life-threatening haemoptysis, or death

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Six minute walk test

    1 year

  • Time to massive haemoptysis (>200mL per day)

    1 year

  • Fev1/FVC

    1 year

  • Total lung capacity (TLC) Total lung capacity (TLC)

    1 year

  • Diffusion capacity (DLCO) Total lung capacity (TLC)

    1 year

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

External Beam Radiotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive radiotherapy (3.5Gy weekly for 5 fractions to a maximum of 17G) prescribed to a central plane using mega-voltage radiation encompassing all the assessed affected lung tissue

Radiation: External beam radiotherapy

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Patients will receive best medical care.

Interventions

External beam radiotherapy will be prescribed to a central plane using mega-voltage radiation encompassing all the assessed affected lung tissue at 3.5Gy weekly for 5 fractions to a maximum of 17G

External Beam Radiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult subjects, 18 years of age and older.
  • Written informed consent provided by patient
  • Current or previously documented admission to hospital with large volume haemoptysis (\>200ml); or haemoptysis with haemodynamic compromise (SBP \< 100mmHg for 15 minutes) or requiring fluid resuscitation; haemoptysis requiring intubation or deemed life-threatening by attending clinicians.
  • The cause of haemoptysis must be due to severe underlying lung destruction/ bronchiectasis, post-tuberculous lung damage or the presence of an aspergillomata.
  • Primary bronchial artery embolisation not considered technically possible or failed BAE
  • Lung resection not possible because of poor cardiopulmonary reserves (as defined by the current ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines, independently reviewed by a team of consisting of a thoracic surgeon, pulmonologist and anaesthetist who will need to be in agreement on inoperability and/or lack of cardiopulmonary reserve)

You may not qualify if:

  • Active tuberculosis
  • High clinical suspicion of lung carcinoma
  • Known deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
  • Any social or psychological condition that may impair insight or compliance with the study including follow up
  • Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigators, places the subject at increased risk for transport and administration of EBRT e.g. severe haemodynamic instability, mechanical ventilation with high FiO2 requirements etc.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Stellenbosch

Cape Town, Western Cape, 7602, South Africa

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Fernando HC, Stein M, Benfield JR, Link DP. Role of bronchial artery embolization in the management of hemoptysis. Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):862-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.8.862.

    PMID: 9711960BACKGROUND
  • von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Koegelenberg CF, Bolliger CT. Functional evaluation before lung resection. Clin Chest Med. 2011 Dec;32(4):773-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.08.001.

    PMID: 22054885BACKGROUND
  • Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, Licker M, Ferguson MK, Faivre-Finn C, Huber RM, Clini EM, Win T, De Ruysscher D, Goldman L; European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons joint task force on fitness for radical therapy. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00184308.

    PMID: 19567600BACKGROUND
  • Koegelenberg CF, Bruwer JW, Bolliger CT. Endobronchial valves in the management of recurrent haemoptysis. Respiration. 2014;87(1):84-8. doi: 10.1159/000355198. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

    PMID: 24334859BACKGROUND
  • Falkson C, Sur R, Pacella J. External beam radiotherapy: a treatment option for massive haemoptysis caused by mycetoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2002 Jun;14(3):233-5. doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0063.

    PMID: 12109828BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HemoptysisTuberculosisBronchiectasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsMycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfectionsBronchial Diseases

Study Officials

  • Brian Allwood, MBChB, PhD

    University of Stellenbosch

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Brian Allwood, MBChB

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2016

First Posted

August 25, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2019

Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations