The Utility of Radiotherapy in the Management of Haemoptysis Secondary to Aspergillomata and Structural Lung Diseases
The Utility of External Beam Radiotherapy for Haemoptysis Secondary to Aspergillomata and Structural Lung Diseases in Patients Who Are Refractory to Medical Management and Not Surgical Candidates: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The sequelae of tuberculosis are still the commonest causes of haemoptysis in the developing world, where life-threatening haemoptysis remains a common and not infrequently fatal medical emergency. Haemoptysis can be life-threatening either as a result of compromised gas exchange or because of circulatory collapse secondary to acute blood loss. Haemodynamic and ventilatory support, followed by bronchial artery embolisation (BAE) as a bridge to potentially curative treatment such as lung resection, remains the standard of care. Often patients do not qualify for surgical intervention and BAE is, at best, a temporary solution. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) may be an alternative, curative intervention in the management of haemoptysis in patients with no alternative options. There is a paucity of studies reporting the use of EBRT in patients without malignancy and with regards to specific doses of EBRT. This pilot study aims to explore the potential of varying doses of EBRT in the management of massive haemoptysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 26, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.7 years
June 23, 2016
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite end-point of time to recurrent life-threatening haemoptysis, or death
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Six minute walk test
1 year
Time to massive haemoptysis (>200mL per day)
1 year
Fev1/FVC
1 year
Total lung capacity (TLC) Total lung capacity (TLC)
1 year
Diffusion capacity (DLCO) Total lung capacity (TLC)
1 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
External Beam Radiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive radiotherapy (3.5Gy weekly for 5 fractions to a maximum of 17G) prescribed to a central plane using mega-voltage radiation encompassing all the assessed affected lung tissue
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will receive best medical care.
Interventions
External beam radiotherapy will be prescribed to a central plane using mega-voltage radiation encompassing all the assessed affected lung tissue at 3.5Gy weekly for 5 fractions to a maximum of 17G
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult subjects, 18 years of age and older.
- Written informed consent provided by patient
- Current or previously documented admission to hospital with large volume haemoptysis (\>200ml); or haemoptysis with haemodynamic compromise (SBP \< 100mmHg for 15 minutes) or requiring fluid resuscitation; haemoptysis requiring intubation or deemed life-threatening by attending clinicians.
- The cause of haemoptysis must be due to severe underlying lung destruction/ bronchiectasis, post-tuberculous lung damage or the presence of an aspergillomata.
- Primary bronchial artery embolisation not considered technically possible or failed BAE
- Lung resection not possible because of poor cardiopulmonary reserves (as defined by the current ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines, independently reviewed by a team of consisting of a thoracic surgeon, pulmonologist and anaesthetist who will need to be in agreement on inoperability and/or lack of cardiopulmonary reserve)
You may not qualify if:
- Active tuberculosis
- High clinical suspicion of lung carcinoma
- Known deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
- Any social or psychological condition that may impair insight or compliance with the study including follow up
- Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigators, places the subject at increased risk for transport and administration of EBRT e.g. severe haemodynamic instability, mechanical ventilation with high FiO2 requirements etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Stellenbosch
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7602, South Africa
Related Publications (5)
Fernando HC, Stein M, Benfield JR, Link DP. Role of bronchial artery embolization in the management of hemoptysis. Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):862-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.8.862.
PMID: 9711960BACKGROUNDvon Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Koegelenberg CF, Bolliger CT. Functional evaluation before lung resection. Clin Chest Med. 2011 Dec;32(4):773-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.08.001.
PMID: 22054885BACKGROUNDBrunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, Licker M, Ferguson MK, Faivre-Finn C, Huber RM, Clini EM, Win T, De Ruysscher D, Goldman L; European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons joint task force on fitness for radical therapy. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00184308.
PMID: 19567600BACKGROUNDKoegelenberg CF, Bruwer JW, Bolliger CT. Endobronchial valves in the management of recurrent haemoptysis. Respiration. 2014;87(1):84-8. doi: 10.1159/000355198. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
PMID: 24334859BACKGROUNDFalkson C, Sur R, Pacella J. External beam radiotherapy: a treatment option for massive haemoptysis caused by mycetoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2002 Jun;14(3):233-5. doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0063.
PMID: 12109828BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Brian Allwood, MBChB, PhD
University of Stellenbosch
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2016
First Posted
August 25, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share