NCT02816229

Brief Summary

Massive haemoptysis is a life-threatening condition which is commonly seen in patients who have previously had pulmonary tuberculosis. Various treatment options exist such as bronchial artery embolisation (BAE) or surgical resection of the affect lung region. However, BAE is not considered curative as there is often recurrence of haemoptysis. Furthermore, not all patients will be deemed suitable for surgical resection, leaving them with very few treatment options. A possible alternative intervention is the insertion of an endobronchial valve (EBV). It is speculated that blood will collect distal to the one way valve and a thrombus will be formed. There is currently no data describing the use of EBV for the treatment of massive haemoptysis. This RCT aims to explore the use and efficacy of EBV in the management of massive haemoptysis.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

June 23, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 11, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

HaemoptysisAspergillusEndobronchial valveInterventional pulmonologyTuberculosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of termination of haemoptysis

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to recurrence of haemoptysis

    1 year

  • Improvement in exercise performance

    1 year

  • Improvement in lung function

    1 year

  • Recurrence of infection/tuberculsis

    1 year

  • EBV related complications

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Insertion of endobronchial valve

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this group will have one or more EBV inserted into the relevant lung regions to manage the haemoptysis via flexible bronchoscopy.

Device: Insertion of endobronchial valve

Best care

NO INTERVENTION

Patients will receive best medical care.

Interventions

One or more endobronchial one- way valves will be inserted into the appropriate lung regions

Insertion of endobronchial valve

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Written informed consent
  • Current or previously documented admission to hospital with large volume haemoptysis (\>200ml/24hour); or haemoptysis with haemodynamic compromise (SBP \< 100mmHg for 15 minutes) or requiring fluid resuscitation; haemoptysis requiring intubation or deemed life-threatening by attending clinicians.
  • The cause of haemoptysis must be due to severe underlying lung destruction/ bronchiectasis, post-tuberculous lung damage or the presence of an aspergillomata.
  • Primary bronchial artery embolisation not considered technically possible\* or failed (defined as ongoing haemoptysis of at least 100 ml per day for 7 days or more, cumulative blood loss of \> 200 ml / 24 hours, or any volume resulting in a systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg for 15 minutes or necessitating resuscitation with vasopressors during a period of 30 days after BAE) and repeat BAE not considered feasible\*
  • Lung resection not possible because of poor cardiopulmonary reserves (as defined by the current ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines28, independently reviewed by a team of consisting of a thoracic surgeon, pulmonologist and anaesthesiologist who will need to in absolute agreement on inoperability and/or lack of cardiopulmonary reserve)

You may not qualify if:

  • Haemodynamic instability (defined as SBP\< 90mmHg requiring ongoing fluid resuscitation or inotropic support)
  • Patients necessitating mechanical ventilation because of respiratory failure or airway management
  • Active tuberculosis
  • High clinical suspicion of lung carcinoma
  • Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigators, places the subject at increased risk for bronchoscopy and EBV placement.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • van den Heuvel MM, Els Z, Koegelenberg CF, Naidu KM, Bolliger CT, Diacon AH. Risk factors for recurrence of haemoptysis following bronchial artery embolisation for life-threatening haemoptysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Aug;11(8):909-14.

    PMID: 17705959BACKGROUND
  • Gross AM, Diacon AH, van den Heuvel MM, Janse van Rensburg J, Harris D, Bolliger CT. Management of life-threatening haemoptysis in an area of high tuberculosis incidence. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Jul;13(7):875-80.

    PMID: 19555538BACKGROUND
  • Freitag L, Tekolf E, Stamatis G, Montag M, Greschuchna D. Three years experience with a new balloon catheter for the management of haemoptysis. Eur Respir J. 1994 Nov;7(11):2033-7.

    PMID: 7875278BACKGROUND
  • Dutau H, Palot A, Haas A, Decamps I, Durieux O. Endobronchial embolization with a silicone spigot as a temporary treatment for massive hemoptysis: a new bronchoscopic approach of the disease. Respiration. 2006;73(6):830-2. doi: 10.1159/000092954. Epub 2006 Apr 21.

    PMID: 16636529BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HemoptysisTuberculosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsMycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfections

Study Officials

  • Brian Allwood, MBChB, PhD

    University of Stellenbosch

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Brian Allwood, MBChB, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2016

First Posted

June 28, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 1, 2020

Last Updated

October 12, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share