A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
A Prospective and Randomized Study Comparing the New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain in Adult Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable is a new version of the Laryngeal Tube-Suction. It has a ventilator channel with a 13.5mm internal diameter, which enables the passage of an Endotracheal Tube either blindly or with fiberoptic guidance.This study was designed to assess the success rate of blind and fiberoptic endotracheal intubation using iLTS-D, in comparison with the and Ambu® AuraGain™ in adult patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 25, 2016
August 1, 2016
Same day
August 15, 2016
August 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to performe blind intubation measure in second
30 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to performe fiberoptic intubation in second
60 seconds
Study Arms (2)
Intubating laryngeal Tube Suction
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntubating laryngeal Tube Suction
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
ACTIVE COMPARATORAmbu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Interventions
Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society Anesthesiology I and II
You may not qualify if:
- Difficult intubation, Cervical pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Somri M, Hochman O, Gaitini L, Hossein J, Gomez-Rios MA. The intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D) versus Ambu(R) Auragain as a conduit facilitating fiberoptic tracheal intubation in adult population: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Dec;88(12):1074-1076. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16731-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 36445250DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2016
First Posted
August 25, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share