NCT02430415

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique vs. the conventional lightwand intubation technique on the cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with the simulated cervical immobilization.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2015

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 30, 2015

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2015

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • maximum cervical spine motion

    maximum angles measured at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, C2-C5 segments.

    during tracheal intubation

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • intubation time

    during tracheal intubation

  • number of intubation trial

    during tracheal intubation

  • sore throat, pain score

    after extubation ~ postoperative day 1

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation - traditional lightwand intubation

Device: laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubationDevice: traditional lightwand intubation

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

traditional lightwand intubation - laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation

Device: laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubationDevice: traditional lightwand intubation

Interventions

laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation

Group AGroup B

traditional lightwand intubation

Group AGroup B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 1-2 and age of 18-80 years undergoing elective endovascular coiling to secure cerebral aneurysm under general anesthesia in neuroangiographic rooms.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with the upper airway abnormalities, such as inflammation, abscesses, tumours, polyps, or trauma.
  • Patients with past medical history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and previous airway surgery, a high risk of aspiration, coagulation disorders, or Hunt Hess grade of 3-5.
  • Body mass index \> 30

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):910-915. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27.

    PMID: 16116013BACKGROUND
  • Davis L, Cook-Sather SD, Schreiner MS. Lighted stylet tracheal intubation: a review. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):745-56. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00044. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10702469BACKGROUND
  • Kim TK, Son JD, Seo H, Lee YS, Bae J, Park HP. A Randomized Crossover Study Comparing Cervical Spine Motion During Intubation Between Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: Laryngoscope-Assisted Versus Conventional Lightwand Intubation. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):485-490. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001813.

Study Officials

  • Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD

    Seoul National University of Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD

CONTACT

Tae Kyong Kim, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2015

First Posted

April 30, 2015

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

April 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 30, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-04