Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Patient Outcomes With Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection vs Adductor Canal Block After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is being done to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing total knee replacement with two different methods of local pain control:shots of liposomal bupivacaine, a long acting anesthetic, directly into the knee during surgery or anesthetic delivered continuously to the adductor canal to provide long term pain relief. The goal is to try to find a standard protocol that provides the greatest pain relief for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 knee-osteoarthritis
Started Jul 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4 knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 8, 2020
October 1, 2020
3.4 years
August 8, 2016
October 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Length of stay (LOS, in days)
Participants will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay, an expected average of 1.5 days
Time to ambulation (in hours)
2-6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 0
6 hours
Pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 1
24 hours
Pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 2
48 hours
Pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 3
72 hours
Pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 4
96 hours
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Liposomal bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeriarticular infiltration of 20cc of liposomal bupivacaine with 10cc of normal saline and 30cc of bupivacaine HCl administered prior to cementation of knee implants
Adductor canal and tibial nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative tibial nerve block with 15cc bupivacaine HCl and adductor canal block with 20cc adductor canal block. Postoperative continuous adductor canal block with 550cc ropivacaine at 8cc per hour
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or non-pregnant female between the ages of 18-65
- Patients willing and able to sign the informed consent
- Patients able to comply with follow-up requirements including self-evaluations
- Patients requiring a primary total knee replacement
- Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis
You may not qualify if:
- Revision total knee arthroplasty
- Bilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Patients with inflammatory arthritis
- Patients with a body mass index (BMI) \> 40
- Allergy to ropivacaine, bupivacaine, or other local anesthetic agents
- Current use of opioid drugs
- Patients with a history of total or unicompartmental reconstruction of the affected joint
- Patients that have had a high tibial osteotomy or femoral osteotomy
- Patients with neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess pain levels
- Patients with a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration
- Patients that are immunologically compromised, or receiving chronic steroids (\>30 days), excluding inhalers
- Patients' bone stock is compromised by disease or infection, which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis
- Patients with knee fusion to the affected joint
- Patients with an active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint
- Patients that are prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Texas Orthopedics
Austin, Texas, 78759, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tyler D Goldberg, MD
Texas Orthopedics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2016
First Posted
August 11, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share