A Pilot Study of the Effects of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia
VESTIBULE
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections on vestibulodynia pain compared to a group treated with a placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2019
CompletedNovember 10, 2022
November 1, 2022
8.8 years
August 1, 2016
November 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain improvement
Significant improvement of pain on contact in the treated group, compared to placebo group, measured with Visual Analogic Scale
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Botulinum toxin
EXPERIMENTALInjection of 50 units (50U) botulinum toxin type A (powder), reconstituted in 1 mL physiologic saline solution in each perineal muscle (100 units in total). First injection at day 1 and. A second injection is scheduled at 3 months, only if there is a 50% or more pain improvement compared to baseline (pain measured with Visual Analogic Scale).
Saline solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORInjection of 1 mL physiologic saline solution in each perineal muscle. A second injection is scheduled at 3 months, only if there is a 50% or more pain improvement compared to baseline (pain measured with Visual Analogic Scale).
Interventions
Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject refractory to conventional treatments (tricyclic antidepressants and benzodiazepines at analgesic doses, biofeedback physical therapy)
- Negative screening test results
- Notified associated factors
- Menopause, surgically sterilized women or women using effective contraceptive method
- Good understanding and predictable adherence to the protocol
- beneficiary/affiliated to French social security/social healthcare
- signed Informed Consent Form
You may not qualify if:
- Predictable poor adherence
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Myasthenia
- Treatment with aminoglycosides
- Major mental disorders
- Underlying etiology
- Vulnerable subjects (particularly adults under guardianship)
- Any reason deemed relevant by the investigator
- Current or former (in the last 3 months) participation to another clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU Besançon
Besançon, 25000, France
Hôpital Tenon
Paris, 75020, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabien Pelletier, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2016
First Posted
August 8, 2016
Study Start
May 4, 2010
Primary Completion
February 11, 2019
Study Completion
February 11, 2019
Last Updated
November 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share