Long Term Follow-up Study of Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder With Urinary Incontinence
1 other identifier
interventional
829
8 countries
8
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the long term safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A in treating patients with idiopathic overactive bladder with urinary incontinence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 5, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2015
CompletedApril 30, 2019
April 1, 2019
4.5 years
May 28, 2009
October 2, 2015
April 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 1
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 2
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 3
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 4
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 5
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-096 (or 3 days prior to each visit in study 191622-095 or 191622-520). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-095 or 191622-520. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in the number of incontinence episodes (worsening).
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 6
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 1
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point TBS
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 2
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point TBS
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 3
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point TBS
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 4
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point TBS
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 5
Percentage of Patients With a Positive Response on the 4-Point TBS
The TBS is a single-item scale in which the patient considers his/her current condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) compared with his/her condition before receiving any study treatment in study 191622-095 or 191622-520. Response options are: 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened. Patients scoring either "greatly improved" or "improved" are considered to have a positive response.
Week 12 Treatment Cycle 6
Secondary Outcomes (30)
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 1
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 2
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 3
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 4
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Study Baseline, Week 12 Treatment Cycle 5
- +25 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
botulinum toxin Type A 100U
EXPERIMENTALBotulinum toxin Type A 100U injected into the detrusor, after protocol specified criteria are met, and no more frequently than every 12 weeks.
botulinum toxin Type A 150U
EXPERIMENTALBotulinum toxin Type A 150U injected into the detrusor, after protocol specified criteria are met, and no more frequently than every 12 weeks.
Interventions
Botulinum toxin Type A 100U or 150U injected into the detrusor, after protocol specified criteria are met, and no more frequently than every 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participation in preceding study 191622-095 (NCT00910845) or 191622-520 (NCT00910520)
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
- Patient has any condition or situation which, in the Investigators opinion, would put the patient at risk from continuing treatment with botulinum toxin Type A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (8)
Unknown Facility
Newport Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Tübingen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Nitti VW, Ginsberg D, Sievert KD, Sussman D, Radomski S, Sand P, De Ridder D, Jenkins B, Magyar A, Chapple C; 191622-096 Investigators. Durable Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Patients with Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Final Results of a 3.5-Year Study. J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):791-800. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.146. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PMID: 27038769BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head,
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2009
First Posted
June 8, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 5, 2014
Study Completion
August 5, 2014
Last Updated
April 30, 2019
Results First Posted
December 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2019-04