Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres
1 other identifier
interventional
186
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme are the third generation of LMA with potential advantages over the classic LMA.Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of LMA in patients during lateral positioned laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to observe the safety and efficacy when LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme used in lateral positioned laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 9, 2017
March 1, 2017
5 months
April 16, 2016
March 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
oropharyngeal seal pressure between LMA Proseal group and LMA Supreme group
The equilibrating airway pressure was recorded when an audible leak occurred over the mouth.
intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Ventilatory efficiency scores for the LMAs
intraoperative
Adverse effects in two groups
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
LMA Proseal group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers.In LMA Prosealgroup,LMA Proseal was inserted into each patient after anesthesia induction.
LMA Supreme group
EXPERIMENTALThe patients were randomly allocated to two groups by using computer-generated numbers.In LMA Supreme group,LMA Supreme was inserted into each patient after anesthesia induction.
Interventions
After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and cisatracurium,LMA Proseal was inserted and cuff inflated in each group.
After preoxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and cisatracurium ,LMA Supreme was inserted and cuff inflated in each group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients belong to ASA physical status grade I and Ⅲ, aged above 18 years and body weight less than 30 kg/m2,who underwent elective laparoscopic urology surgery in the lateral position.
You may not qualify if:
- The patients with anticipated difficult airway (e.g., Modified Mallampati Class IV, oropharyngeal pathology), severe cardiopulmonary disease, increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration (e.g., gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and pregnant patients), and retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Liu Yi, D.M
Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2016
First Posted
August 2, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03