NCT02846532

Brief Summary

The Purpose of this study is to characterize the single and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/ PD) profiles after oral rivaroxaban therapy administered to pediatric participants 2 to 8 years of age with single ventricle physiology who have completed the Fontan procedure within 4 months prior to enrollment (Part A) and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban, administered twice daily (exposure matched to rivaroxaban 10 milligram \[mg\] once daily in adults) compared to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), given once daily (approximately 5 milligram per kilogram \[mg/kg\]) for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric participants 2 to 8 years of age with single ventricle physiology who have completed the Fontan procedure within 4 months prior to enrollment.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
10 countries

42 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 16, 2016

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 16, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2020

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 28, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

July 25, 2016

Results QC Date

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ThromboembolismFontan ProcedureChildren

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (35)

  • Percentage of Participants With Any Thrombotic Event (Venous or Arterial and Symptomatic or Asymptomatic)

    Thrombotic event was defined as the appearance of a new thrombotic burden within the cardiovascular system on either routine surveillance or clinically indicated imaging, or the occurrence of a clinical event known to be strongly associated with thrombus (such as cardioembolic stroke, pulmonary embolism). The event included ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, venous thrombosis, arterial/intracardiac thrombosis, and other thrombosis.

    Up to 12 months

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 1 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 1 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 4 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: Up to 3 hours predose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 4 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 4 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Day 4 (6-8 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 6-8 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Month 3 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: Up to 3 hours predose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Month 3 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Plasma Concentration of Rivaroxaban at Month 3 (2.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations for Parts A and B were assessed. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 2.5-4 hours postdose

  • Percentage of Participants With Bleeding Events

    Bleeding events were categorized into major, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNM), and trivial bleeding events. Major bleeding: overt bleeding and associated with a fall in hemoglobin of 2 gram per deciliter (g/dL) or more; or leading to a transfusion of the equivalent of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood in adults; or occurring in a critical site: intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intra-articular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal; or contributing to death. CRNM bleeding: overt bleeding not meeting the criteria for major bleeding but associated with: Medical intervention, or Unscheduled contact with a physician, cessation of study treatment, or Discomfort for the subject such as pain, or Impairment of activities of daily life. Trivial bleeding: any other overt bleeding event that does not meet criteria for CRNM bleeding.

    Up to 12 months

  • Absolute Prothrombin Time (PT) at Day 1 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute prothrombin time was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Day 1 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Day 4 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: Up to 3 hours predose

  • Absolute PT at Day 4 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Day 4 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Day 4 (6-8 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 6-8 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Month 3 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: Up to 3 hours predose

  • Absolute PT at Month 3 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Absolute PT at Month 3 (2.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Absolute PT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 2.5-4 hours postdose

  • Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) at Day 1 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Day 1 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Day 4 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: Up to 3 hours predose

  • aPTT at Day 4 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Day 4 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average for the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Day 4 (6-8 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 6-8 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Month 3 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: Up to 3 hours predose

  • aPTT at Month 3 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • aPTT at Month 3 (2.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    aPTT was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 2.5-4 hours postdose

  • Anti-FXa at Day 1 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Anti-FXa at Day 1 (1.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 1: 1.5-4 hours postdose

  • Anti-FXa at Day 4 (6-8 Hours Postdose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Day 4: 6-8 hours postdose

  • Anti-FXa at Month 3 (Up to 3 Hours Predose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: Up to 3 hours predose

  • Anti-FXa at Month 3 (0.5-1.5 Hours Postdose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 0.5-1.5 hours postdose

  • Anti-FXa at Month 3 (2.5-4 Hours Postdose)

    Anti-FXa was assessed as pharmacodynamic parameter. Each participant was assessed once within the specified time-range and the average of the participants included in the given time-range is presented here.

    Month 3: 2.5-4 hours postdose

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Up to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Rivaroxaban

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Rivaroxaban

Acetylsalicylic Acid

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Acetylsalicylic Acid

Interventions

Participants will receive oral suspension containing rivaroxaban 1 milligram per milliliter (mg/ml) twice daily in Part A and Part B. Following total daily doses of Rivaroxaban will be administered based on the weight of the participants: 7 to \<8 kilogram (kg) will receive 2.2 milligram (mg); 8 to \<10 kg will receive 3.2 mg; 10 to\<12 kg will receive 3.4 mg; 12 to \<20 will receive 4.0 mg and 20 to \<30 will receive 5.0 mg.

Rivaroxaban

Participants will receive 5 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) of acetylsalicylic acid once daily up to 12 months in Part B.

Acetylsalicylic Acid

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 8 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant must be considered to be clinically stable by the investigator and able to tolerate oral or enteral administration of a suspension formulation and oral/enteral feedings
  • Satisfactory initial post-Fontan transthoracic echocardiographic Screening as defined in the Post-Fontan Echocardiographic Examination Research Protocol
  • Parent/legally acceptable representative must sign an informed consent form (ICF) and child assent will also be provided, if applicable, according to local requirements

You may not qualify if:

  • Evidence of thrombosis, including those that are asymptomatic confirmed by post-Fontan procedure transthoracic echocardiogram, or other imaging techniques, during the Screening period of the study
  • History of gastrointestinal disease or surgery associated with clinically relevant impaired absorption
  • History of or signs/symptoms suggestive of protein-losing enteropathy
  • Active bleeding or high risk for bleeding contraindicating antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, including a history of intracranial bleeding
  • Platelet count less than (\<)50\*10\^9/Liters (L) at Screening
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2)
  • Known clinically significant liver disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (42)

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Ghent, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Curitiba, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kitakyushu-shi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Setagaya Ku, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

México, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Leiden, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Utrecht, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

A Coruña, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Bilbao, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Valencia, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • McCrindle BW, Michelson AD, Van Bergen AH, Suzana Horowitz E, Pablo Sandoval J, Justino H, Harris KC, Jefferies JL, Miriam Pina L, Peluso C, Nessel K, Lu W, Li JS; UNIVERSE Study Investigators *. Thromboprophylaxis for Children Post-Fontan Procedure: Insights From the UNIVERSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e021765. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021765. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ThrombosisThromboembolism

Interventions

RivaroxabanAspirin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Embolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsMorpholinesOxazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsSalicylatesHydroxybenzoatesPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Results Point of Contact

Title
SR DIRECTOR
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2016

First Posted

July 27, 2016

Study Start

November 16, 2016

Primary Completion

July 16, 2020

Study Completion

July 16, 2020

Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Results First Posted

March 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations