NCT02845232

Brief Summary

Blood transfusion requirement represents one of the most significant cost driver associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition to an increase prevalence of co morbidities in older patients, AML in older patients is more often associated with adverse features than in younger adults. Physicians might therefore decide to offer palliative or supportive care rather than intensive chemotherapy. An alternative treatment could be low-intensity therapy, such as LD-AraC or hypomethylating agents, which demonstrated better results than only Best Supportive care (BSC). Blood transfusion requirement represents one of the most significant cost driver associated with AML. The present study assesses the cost-effectiveness of intensive chemotherapy versus Best Supportive Care (BSC) versus alternative therapies (hypomethylating agents, low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LD-AraC), or other investigational drugs) in elderly patients aged 70 years or older regarding blood product transfusions from a French payer perspective. Intensive chemotherapy and BSC were the comparators in this analysis, since they continue to represent the most commonly used treatment for elderly AML according to the defined status of patients considered as 'fit' or 'unfit' for intensive chemotherapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
214

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Acute myeloid leukemiaTherapyBlood transfusionCost-effectivenessPrognosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Estimation of mean blood product transfusions costs (in euros) per patient according to overall survival

    The cost-effectiveness of blood product transfusion was determined among initial treatment subgroups: patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, patients receiving low-intensity treatments, and patients treated only by BSC.

    From starting treatment to death from any cause (up to 21 months)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Complete remission (CR) rate

    Duration of study (Month 21)

  • Number of blood product transfusions per patient

    Duration of study (Month 21)

Study Arms (3)

Intensive chemotherapy

First group: 68 patients receiving a combination of intermediate-dose cytarabine and an anthracycline. One patient with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) also received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA).

Other: Transfusion

Lower-intensity treatments

The second study group comprised 70 patients who were treated on frontline by lower-intensity treatments \[LD-AraC(39 patients), azacitidine (16 patients), decitabine (11 patients),tipifarnib (3 patients), or ATRA (1 patient)\]. Patients received LD-AraC 20 mg once or twice daily (according to physician'schoice) by subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days. Azacitidine was given at the dose of 75 mg/m2/day for 7 consecutive days by sc injection. Decitabine was administered by intravenous route once daily at 20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days. Tipifarnib was given at 600 mg administered orally twice daily for 21 consecutive days in 4-week cycles. ATRA was given at 45 mg/m2until CR achievement followed by maintenance combining 6-mercaptopurine with methotrexate.

Other: Transfusion

Best Supportive Care

The last study group comprises 76 patients: 31 patients received supportive care, while 36 patients also received hydroxyurea and 9 patients received 6-mercaptopurine.

Other: Transfusion

Interventions

The number and type of blood products administered were registered from the time of diagnosis to the time of death corresponding for all patients to the time of last follow-up. Transfusion of a single unit of packed red blood cell (PRBC) or one whole blood-derived platelet concentrate (PC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was considered a transfusion event and considered for statistical analysis.

Best Supportive CareIntensive chemotherapyLower-intensity treatments

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Three groups of elderly patients aged 70 years or older, with AML. First group: 68 patients receiving a combination of intermediate-dose cytarabine and an anthracycline. One patient with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) also received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). The second study group comprised 70 patients who were treated on frontline by lower-intensity treatments \[LD-AraC(39 patients), azacitidine (16 patients), decitabine (11 patients),tipifarnib (3 patients), or ATRA (1 patient)\]. The last study group comprises 76 patients: 31 patients received supportive care, while 36 patients also received hydroxyurea and 9 patients received 6-mercaptopurine.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 70 years old
  • AML according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (% of blasts ≥ 20% in bone marrow aspiration).
  • All FAB subtypes.
  • Any type of AML (de novo or secondary)
  • All participants to clinical trials gave their written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≥2
  • Active uncontrolled infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet

Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Interventions

Blood Transfusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, MyeloidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biological TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Xavier THOMAS, MD-PhD

    Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2016

First Posted

July 27, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations