NCT02830035

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of real-time ultrasound guidance on spinal anesthesia vs the traditional anatomical landmark technique, by comparing success rate of spinal needle insertion, success rate rate of single needle pass, duration and immediate complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 8, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasound guidedspinal anesthesianeuraxial blockparamedian

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • success rate of spinal needle insertion

    The ability of getting a successful spinal anesthesia with a single skin puncture regardless of needle redirection.

    during the procedure of spinal anesthesia

  • success rate of single needle pass

    The ability of getting a successful spinal anesthesia with a single skin puncture and no needle redirection.

    during the procedure of spinal anesthesia

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • duration of procedure

    during the procedure of spinal anesthesia

  • immediate complication

    immediately after and within 1 week after given spinal anesthesia

Study Arms (2)

Anatomical Landmark Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Traditional anatomical landmark technique based paramedian spinal anesthesia

Procedure: Anatomical Landmark Technique

Real-time Ultrasound-guided Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ultrasound-guided paramedian spinal anesthesia Intervention: Ultrasound-guided Technique

Procedure: Real-time Ultrasound-guided

Interventions

Real-time ultrasound guided paramedian spinal anesthesia

Real-time Ultrasound-guided Technique

Conventional anatomical landmark technique for paramedian spinal anesthesia

Anatomical Landmark Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consented adults aged at least 18 years old.
  • ASA I to III.
  • Presented for lower limb surgery.
  • Fasted for at least 6 hours.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Contraindication to neuraxial block.
  • Patient on anticoagulant medication, or coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5)
  • Patient on double antiplatelet, or thrombocytopenia (platelet \< 100)
  • Local infection at site of injection
  • Indeterminate neurological disease
  • Allergy to local anaesthetics
  • Spinal abnormality
  • Pregnancy.
  • Previous surgery to lumbar region.
  • BMI \> 30

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Niazi AU, Chin KJ, Jin R, Chan VW. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia using the SonixGPS ultrasound guidance system: a feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Aug;58(7):875-81. doi: 10.1111/aas.12353. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

    PMID: 24943307BACKGROUND
  • Ansari T, Yousef A, El Gamassy A, Fayez M. Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics: is there an advantage over the landmark technique in patients with easily palpable spines? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Aug;23(3):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

    PMID: 24768303BACKGROUND
  • Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jan;21(1):25-31. doi: 10.1017/s026502150400105x.

    PMID: 14768920BACKGROUND
  • Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H, Brown DL, Enneking FK, Heit JA, Mulroy MF, Rosenquist RW, Rowlingson J, Tryba M, Yuan CS. Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risks (the second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anesthesia and Anticoagulation). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):172-97. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50046. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12772135BACKGROUND
  • Wang Q, Yin C, Wang TL. Ultrasound facilitates identification of combined spinal-epidural puncture in obese parturients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Nov;125(21):3840-3.

    PMID: 23106885BACKGROUND
  • Conroy PH, Luyet C, McCartney CJ, McHardy PG. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study of a new approach. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:525818. doi: 10.1155/2013/525818. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23365568BACKGROUND
  • Brinkmann S, Tang R, Sawka A, Vaghadia H. Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guided spinal injection using SonixGPS: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;60(9):896-901. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9984-9. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

    PMID: 23780883BACKGROUND
  • Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan V, Brown-Shreves D, Koshkin A, Vaishnav V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8ad4.

    PMID: 21572316BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Soon Eu Chong, MD, MMed

    Universiti Sains Malaysia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohd Nikman Ahmad, MD, MMed

    Universiti Sains Malaysia

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Lecturer in Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2016

First Posted

July 12, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations