A Pilot RCT of Veraflo With Prontosan vs VAC in Wounds Requiring Operative Debridement
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the V.A.C. Ulta Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System With V.A.C. VeraFlo Dressing System in Operatively Debrided Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
181
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the Veraflo with Prontosan vs VAC in wounds that require operative debridement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 29, 2017
CompletedDecember 2, 2024
November 1, 2024
2.3 years
May 9, 2013
June 7, 2017
November 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Inpatient Operating Room Debridements
Debridement in this outcome refers to surgical removal of non viable tissue performed in an operating room
until the wound is deemed ready for closure or coverage by the investigator up to 64 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Difference in Total Bacterial Counts Measured in Colony Forming Units (CFU) as Determined by Quantitative PCR Analysis.
Immediately following initial post debridement to the first dressing change up to 72 hours
Study Arms (2)
V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation
EXPERIMENTALTreatment Arm
V.A.C.Ulta without instillation
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl Arm
Interventions
NPWT with instillation of a wound cleanser (Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The Subject:
- has a wound prior to informed consent
- will be admitted as an inpatient
- is \>= 18 years of age at time of consent
- is able to provide his/her own informed consent
- is willing and able to return for all scheduled and required study visits
- has an open wound \>= 4cm in any plane of measurement excluding tunnels after initial surgical debridement
- has a wound that is appropriate for NPWT according to approved indications for use
- has not participated in a clinical trial within the past 30 days
- has a 30 day wound history available if the wound has been previously treated
You may not qualify if:
- The Subject:
- is pregnant as determined by a positive serum or urine pregnancy test at the time of screening
- has a life expectancy of \< 12 months
- is not healthy enough to undergo surgery for any reason
- has, in the investigator's opinion, any clinically significant condition that would impair the participant's ability to comply with the study procedures
- has, in the opinion of the investigator, a condition that will not allow the subject to tolerate the therapy (e.g. painful conditions such as vasculitis)
- has rheumatoid arthritis
- has a bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
- has a wound that contains antibiotic cement or beads
- has an ischemic lower extremity wound as determined by lack of detectable pulses in the extremity or ankle-brachial pressure indices of \< 0.9 with a history of diabetes, or \< 0.6 if the subject is non-diabetic
- has a known allergy or hypersensitivity to V.A.C. Therapy dressing components including polyurethane or polyvinyl alcohol (drape and foam), or materials that contain acrylic adhesive (drape adhesive)
- has a known allergy or hyper sensitivity to 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film or any of its components including Hexamethyldisiloxane, isooctane, acrylate terpolymer, polyphenylmethysiloxane, copolymer
- has a know allergy or hypersensitivity to Prontosan or any of its components including polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), or undecylenamidopropyl betaine
- has received NPWT on the study wound within the last 30 days
- has a wound that is contraindicated with Prontosan
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KCI USA, Inclead
Study Sites (7)
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
St. Luke's University Hospital
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Limitations and Caveats
Prontosan was used for instillation in this study. Approximately \~75% of wounds were not infected. Therefore benefits from a solution with antiseptic properties would be expected to be limited. Acelity is planning to conduct a study using saline.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anthony Tate, RN, BSN
- Organization
- KCI, an Acelity Company
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2013
First Posted
June 4, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 2, 2024
Results First Posted
November 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2024-11