Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation
INK
Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intravenous Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: a Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
470
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of intranasal (IN) ketamine compared to standard intravenous (IV) ketamine administration for simple reductions of orthopaedic injuries in the paediatric population. The aim is to assess if IN administration is equivalent to the current standard of care, IV. The population to be studied is children 4-17 years of age who require a simple orthopaedic reduction. Following a double dummy approach to overcome the difficulty in masking interventions, each participant will receive both IV and IN interventions, only one of which will be the real drug. Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) will be assessed using the Dartmouth Operative Conditions Scale (DOCS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedAugust 29, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.3 years
June 30, 2016
August 25, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adequacy of sedation
Proportion with DOCS score -2 to +2 for duration of fracture reduction
Duration of fracture reduction
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Depth of sedation
Duration of fracture reduction
Onset of adequate sedation
Within 1 hour following intervention
Duration of sedation
Within 2 hours following intervention
Proportion of time participant adequately sedated during fracture reduction
Within 2 hours following intervention
Adverse events
Within 2 hours following intervention
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
IN ketamine and IV saline
EXPERIMENTALKetamine, single dose, 10 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg) of 100 mg/mL solution delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares to a maximum of 800 mg (8 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg delivered intravenously to a maximum of 2.4 mL
IV ketamine and IN saline
ACTIVE COMPARATORKetamine, single dose, 1 to 1.5 mg/kg (0.02 to 0.03 mL/kg) of 50 mg/mL solution delivered intravenously, to a maximum of 120 mg (2.4 mL) AND 0.9% normal saline (NS) 0.1 mL/kg delivered intranasally using an atomizer and divided to both nares, to a maximum of 8 mL
Interventions
Intranasal ketamine 100 mg/mL solution (10 mg/kg, maximum 800 mg)
Intravenous ketamine 50 mg/mL solution (1 to 1.5 mg/kg, maximum 120 mg)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 4 -17 years
- Up to 80 kg
- Presenting the paediatric emergency department
- Require a closed reduction by procedural sedation and analgesia
- Acute (=\< 48 hours) distal radius and/or ulna fracture that is angulated with or without displacement
- No more than 0.5 cm shortening in either the radius or ulna (not both)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous hypersensitivity reaction to ketamine
- Globe rupture
- Traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- Nasal bone deformity
- Duration of reduction expected to be greater than 20 minutes
- Poor English or French fluency in the absence of a native language interpreter
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 3 or greater
- Previous sedation with ketamine within 24 hours
- Previous diagnosis of schizophrenia or psychosis based on DSM-V criteria
- Pregnancy
- Neuro-cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent, assent, or ability to self-report pain and satisfaction
- Multi-limb trauma
- Hemodynamic compromise
- Glasgow coma score \< 15
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Heath A, Offringa M, Pechlivanoglou P, Rios JD, Klassen TP, Poonai N, Pullenayegum E; KidsCAN PERC Innovative Paediatric Clinical Trials Team. Determining a Bayesian predictive power stopping rule for futility in a non-inferiority trial with binary outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 8;18:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100561. eCollection 2020 Jun.
PMID: 32300671DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naveen Poonai, MD
Western University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2016
First Posted
July 11, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share