Diagnostic Performance of the Ultra Low-Dose (ULD) Scanner vs. Diagnostic Performance With Standard X-rays in the Emergency Department Compared With Performance of the Standard Classical-dose Scanner for Trauma of the Dorsolumbar Spine, Pelvis and Extremities
ULD-Traumato
2 other identifiers
observational
554
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The conventional standard-dose scanner leads to a significantly greater X-ray exposure than the standard X-ray. Recently, technological innovations like the ULD ("Ultra Low Dose") scanner have been developed to reduce the dose of X-rays delivered to the patient. The general purpose of this study is to validate the ULD scanner in case of emergency trauma of the dorsolumbar spine, pelvis and / or extremities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 10, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.9 years
August 23, 2019
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Presence of at least one fracture in the dorsal spine evaluated with a classical, standard-dose scan (Gold standard)
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture in the lumbar spine evaluated with a classical, standard-dose scan (Gold standard)
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the pelvis and proximal femurs evaluated with a classical, standard-dose scan (Gold standard)
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the hands / wrists evaluated with a classical, standard-dose scan (Gold standard)
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the feet /ankles evaluated with a classical, standard-dose scan (Gold standard)
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture in the dorsal spine evaluated with a ULD scan
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture in the lumbar spine evaluated with a ULD scan
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture in the pelvis and proximal femurs evaluated with a ULD scan
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the hands / wrists evaluated with a ULD scan
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the feet /ankles evaluated with a ULD scan
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the dorsal spine evaluated with a standard X-ray
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the lumbar spine evaluated with a standard X-ray
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the pelvis and proximal femurs evaluated with a standard X-ray
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the hands / wrists evaluated with a standard X-ray
YES/NO
Day 0
Presence of at least one fracture of the feet /ankles evaluated with a standard X-ray
YES/NO
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Presence of an abnormality of the bone structure at the anatomic site(s) concerned evaluated with a classical Gold Standard scan
Day 0
Presence of an abnormality of the soft tissues at the anatomic site(s) concerned evaluated with a classical Gold Standard scan
Day 0
Presence of an abnormality of the joints at the anatomic site(s) concerned evaluated with a classical Gold Standard scan
Day 0
Presence of an abnormality of the invertebral discs at the anatomic site(s) concerned evaluated with a classical Gold Standard scan
Day 0
Presence of an abnormality of the bone structure at the anatomic site(s) concerned evaluated with a ULD scan
Day 0
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with fractures
Interventions
The following doses will be applied: 6 mGy.cm for the extremities 50 mGy.cm for the dorsal spine 130 mGy.cm for the lumbar spine 130 mGy.cm for the pelvis
The following doses will be applied: For the pelvis : front view and profile for the hip. For the dorsal spine : front and profile. For the lumbar spine : front and profile For the extremities : front and profile
The following doses will be applied: 6 mGy.cm for the extremities 50 mGy.cm for the dorsal spine 130 mGy.cm for the lumbar spine 130 mGy.cm for the pelvis
Eligibility Criteria
Any patient presenting at the emergency department patient for trauma of the dorso-lumbar spine, pelvis, proximal femurs, and / or extremities requiring standard X-rays.
You may qualify if:
- Patient with a BMI \<40 kg / m²
- Emergency department patient for trauma of the dorso-lumbar spine, pelvis, proximal femurs, and / or extremities requiring standard radiographs
- Patient with painful symptomatology causing suspicion of a broken bone
- Patient or family member / trusted person / family member who has given free and informed consent
- Patient or family member / trusted person / family member who has signed the consent form
- Patient beneficiary or affiliate of a health insurance plan
You may not qualify if:
- Patient participating in a category 1 study
- Patient on under juridical protection, under curatorship or under guardianship
- Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information
- Pregnant, parturient or nursing patient
- Polytraumatised patient
- Patients in vital emergency requiring urgent scanner
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
Clinique de l'Union
Saint-Jean, Haute-Garonne, 31240, France
Clinique du Parc
Castelnau-le-Lez, Hérault, 34170, France
Centre Hospitalier de Mont-de-Marsan
Mont-de-Marsan, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 40024, France
Menouer TALEB
Alès, France
Related Publications (1)
Hamard A, Greffier J, Bastide S, Larbi A, Addala T, Sadate A, Beregi JP, Frandon J. Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2621-2633. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07304-8. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
PMID: 33034747RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed LARBI, Dr.
CHU de Nîmes (Nîmes University Hospital)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2019
First Posted
August 30, 2019
Study Start
October 21, 2019
Primary Completion
September 12, 2023
Study Completion
September 12, 2025
Last Updated
December 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12