Study Stopped
Study on-hold due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Will resume when possible.
Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Control During First Trimester Surgical Abortion
1 other identifier
interventional
123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A therapeutic abortion is one of the most common procedures performed in Canada, with approximately 100,000 occurring annually. 95% of induced abortions are done surgically, with just over two thirds of these procedures taking place in the first trimester. This study will be a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with three parallel groups; oral morphine vs intravenous fentanyl vs intravenous ketamine. The primary outcome will be immediate post-operative pain following a first trimester therapeutic abortion as assessed using the visual analogue scale. Randomization will be performed as block randomization with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. In total, 123 participants will be recruited and randomized, with 41 being assigned to each treatment arm. This study will be conducted at the Women's Clinic at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Women from Kingston and the surrounding areas are referred to this clinic and can self-refer for therapeutic abortion. The investogators hope that this research will move us towards a better form of pain control for our participants undergoing first trimester surgical abortion, without increasing length of stay, side effects, or adverse events. This, in turn, will hopefully improve access to optimal pain control to participants undergoing first trimester surgical abortion in an outpatient setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedSeptember 8, 2022
September 1, 2022
4.6 years
November 20, 2018
September 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VAS Pain Score - Immediate Post-Procedure
The primary outcome measure is mean difference in immediate post-operative pain measured by the visual analogue pain scale (VAS). The VAS is a validated tool for research in operative pain management. Using this scale, participants rate their current pain on a scale from 0 to 10 by drawing an "x" on the horizontal line. This line is 10cm long and the participant's pain level is measured using a ruler to the millimeter mark and translated to a score out of 100mm. If the "x" falls between millimeter marks on the ruler the reader will round up to the nearest mark.
Immediate Post-Procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
VAS Pain Score - Prior to Discharge
Prior to discharge from recovery room on day of procedure (typically within 1h post-procedure)
Length of Stay in Recovery
Day of Procedure
Satisfaction with Pain Control - Prior to Discharge
Prior to discharge from recovery room on day of procedure (typically within 1h post-procedure)
Medication Side Effects
Prior to discharge from recovery room on day of procedure (typically within 1h post-procedure)
Provider Assessment of Intra-Operative Pain Management
Intra-Operative
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
PO Morphine & IV Placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne third of study participants will be randomized to this local standard of care arm.
IV Fentanyl & PO Placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne third of study participants will be randomized to this current gold standard of care arm.
IV Ketamine & PO Placebo
EXPERIMENTALOne third of study participants will be randomized to this experimental arm.
Interventions
10-20mg oral morphine depending on such factors as weight (100-200mcg/kg), previous opiate exposure (opiate naĂ¯ve vs opiate sensitized), and participant's previous experiences with opiate medications for painful procedures. Dosing will be determined at the discretion of the surgical provider in clinic that day, as per standard of care.
0.5-1mcg/kg IV fentanyl over 2 minutes repeated every 5 minutes as needed until appropriate analgesia is reached.
200-500mcg/kg IV over 2 minutes repeated every 5 minutes as needed until appropriate analgesia is reached
A standard placebo pill, the same size, shape and colour of the oral morphine. The placebo will be administered to the participants randomized to the IV ketamine and IV fentanyl during pre-op in the same manner the oral morphine would be administered.
This normal saline will be administered to the participants randomized to the oral morphine group during the procedure in the same manner that IV fentanyl or IV ketamine would be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed first trimester pregnancy with an ultrasound showing a viable intrauterine pregnancy with a gestational age of less than 12 weeks since the last menstrual period
- Unwanted pregnancy and consented to undergo a first trimester surgical abortion
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years at the time of study enrollment
- Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the medications used in the study
- Any serious medical comorbidity that would make IV sedation contraindicated in an outpatient setting (ex. Heart disease, lung disease)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, K7L2V7, Canada
Related Publications (22)
Induced abortions reported in Canada in 2016. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018. Available at: https://www.cihi.ca/en/induced-abortions-reported-in-canada-in-2016. Accessed on July 29, 2018.
BACKGROUNDCostescu D, Guilbert E. No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):750-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.010.
PMID: 29861084BACKGROUNDAllen RH, Fitzmaurice G, Lifford KL, Lasic M, Goldberg AB. Oral compared with intravenous sedation for first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):276-83. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181938758.
PMID: 19155895BACKGROUNDAgostini A, Maruani J, Roblin P, Champion J, Cravello L, Gamerre M. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the use of a 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide/oxygen in legal abortions. Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.015. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
PMID: 22264664BACKGROUNDKan AS, Caves N, Wong SY, Ng EH, Ho PC. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial on the use of a 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide/oxygen in pain relief during suction evacuation for the first trimester pregnancy termination. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2606-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del234. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
PMID: 16790607BACKGROUNDStrayer RJ, Nelson LS. Adverse events associated with ketamine for procedural sedation in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;26(9):985-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.12.005.
PMID: 19091264BACKGROUNDGalloon S. Ketamine for dilatation and curettage. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1971 Nov;18(6):600-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03026180. No abstract available.
PMID: 5119802BACKGROUNDHejja P, Galloon S. A consideration of ketamine dreams. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975 Jan;22(1):100-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03004825.
PMID: 1109698BACKGROUNDErbguth PH, Reiman B, Klein RL. The influence of chlorpromazine, diazepam, and droperidol on emergence from ketamine. Anesth Analg. 1972 Sep-Oct;51(5):693-700. No abstract available.
PMID: 4560720BACKGROUNDHervey WH, Hustead RF. Ketamine for dilatation and currettage procedures: patient acceptance. Anesth Analg. 1972 Jul-Aug;51(4):647-55.
PMID: 5064798BACKGROUNDKrestow M. The effect of post-anaesthetic dreaming on patient acceptance of ketamine anaesthesia: a comparison with thiopentone-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1974 Jul;21(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03006072. No abstract available.
PMID: 4836917BACKGROUNDFreuchen I, Ostergaard J, Kuhl JB, Mikkelsen BO. Reduction of psychotomimetic side effects of Ketalar (ketamine) by Rohypnol (flunitrazepam). A randomized, double-blind trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1976;20(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1976.tb05015.x.
PMID: 7095BACKGROUNDCoad NR, Mills PJ, Verma R, Ramasubramanian R. Evaluation of blood loss during suction termination of pregnancy: ketamine compared with methohexitone. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986 Apr;30(3):253-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02407.x.
PMID: 3739583BACKGROUNDRenner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman AB. Pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception. 2010 May;81(5):372-88. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
PMID: 20399943BACKGROUNDGodwin SA, Burton JH, Gerardo CJ, Hatten BW, Mace SE, Silvers SM, Fesmire FM; American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;63(2):247-58.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.015.
PMID: 24438649BACKGROUNDAtkinson P, French J, Nice CA. Procedural sedation and analgesia for adults in the emergency department. BMJ. 2014 May 8;348:g2965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2965. No abstract available.
PMID: 24812113BACKGROUNDGreen SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):449-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.030. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
PMID: 21256625BACKGROUNDNewton A, Fitton L. Intravenous ketamine for adult procedural sedation in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2008 Aug;25(8):498-501. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.053421.
PMID: 18660398BACKGROUNDCoralic Z, Sawe HR, Mfinanga JA, Cortez A, Koehl J, Siroker H, Reynolds TA. Ketamine procedural sedation in the emergency department of an urban tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Emerg Med J. 2018 Apr;35(4):214-219. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206974. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PMID: 29358491BACKGROUNDBisanzo M, Nichols K, Hammerstedt H, Dreifuss B, Nelson SW, Chamberlain S, Kyomugisha F, Noble A, Arthur A, Thomas S. Nurse-administered ketamine sedation in an emergency department in rural Uganda. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;59(4):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PMID: 22169331BACKGROUNDSacchetti A, Senula G, Strickland J, Dubin R. Procedural sedation in the community emergency department: initial results of the ProSCED registry. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):41-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.023. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
PMID: 16946280BACKGROUNDAllen RH, Singh R. Society of Family Planning clinical guidelines pain control in surgical abortion part 1 - local anesthesia and minimal sedation. Contraception. 2018 Jun;97(6):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 29407363BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sophie Bussiere-Cote, MD
Queen's University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashley Waddington, MD, MPA
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- For the three treatment arms, the nurses, the study participants, and the abortion provider will be blinded to study arm assignment and will remain blinded throughout the course of the study. As such, all study personnel who will be administering questionnaires will be appropriately blinded to minimize bias. The provider of the IV medications will not be blinded. This decision was made in order to ensure participant safety in titrating medication doses, and to avoid the need to unblind all members if a reversal agent is required. The provider of the anesthetic will not disclose which study arm the participant belongs to and will not be involved in administering questionnaires or data analysis.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2018
First Posted
November 23, 2018
Study Start
June 10, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
September 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09