Concentration-Volume Relationship in Infraclavicular Block
Impact of Local Anesthetic Concentration-Volume Modifications on Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Nerve Block Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, double blind study aims to determine the optimal volume for adequate sensorial and motor blockade following an infraclavicular block. Patients will be randomized into three groups. Using a constant dose of local anesthetics (45mg bupivacaine 180mg prilocaine), different volumes will be used in each of the groups (First group; 18mL, second group; 27mL, third group; 36mL). Onset, duration and quality of sensory and motor block will be compared for patients between groups
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 5, 2017
January 1, 2017
4 months
June 10, 2016
January 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Sensory Block, as assessed by hollman scale for pinprick test
Sensorial response to pinprick will be assessed at innervation sites of ulnar median radial and musculocutaneous nerves. Innervation sites of assessment are volar skin of the fifth finger for ulnar nerve, volar skin of second finger for median nerve and dorsal, proximal of the second finger for radial nerve and skin of the anterolateral forearm for musculocutaneous nerve.
0, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 20th, 25th, 30th minute
Motor Block, as assessed by hollman scale for motor blockade
Motor function for each nerve will be assessed. Movements to be evaluated are; abduction of the fingers for ulnar nerve, thumb opposition for median nerve, extension of the forearm for radial nerve and flexion of the forearm for musculocutaneous nerve.
0, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 20th, 25th, 30th minute
Postoperative Sensory Block, as assessed by hollman scale for pinprick test
1th hour in PACU
Postoperative Motor Block, as assessed by hollman scale for motor blockadet
1th hour in PACU
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain, as assessed by visual analogue scale
1st hour and 6th hour
Study Arms (3)
Concentrated
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfraclavicular nerve block under guidance of ultrasonography will be performed using an undiluted solution of 45mg bupivacaine and 180mg prilocaine (bupivacaine 0.25% and prilocaine 1%, 18mL in total) to patients in this group
Diluted by 33%
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfraclavicular nerve block under guidance of ultrasonography will be performed using a solution of 45mg bupivacaine and 180mg prilocaine diluted by 33% (bupivacaine 0.167% and prilocaine 0.66%, 27mL in total) to patients in this group
Diluted by 50%
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfraclavicular nerve block under guidance of ultrasonography will be performed using a solution of 45mg bupivacaine and 180mg prilocaine diluted by 50% (bupivacaine 0.125% and prilocaine 0.5%, 36mL in total) to patients in this group
Interventions
Ultrasound guided infraclavicular nerve block
All nerve blocks will be performed with ultrasound guidance
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for upper extremity surgery with infraclavicular nerve block
You may not qualify if:
- Patient Refusal
- Patients younger than 18
- Patients with known local anesthetic allergies
- Patients with a BMI\>30
- Diabetic Patients
- Uncooperated Patients
- Patients with coagulopathy or recieving anticoagulant therapy
- Skin infection on injection site
- Patients diagnosed with sepsis or bacteremia
- Physiologic and emotional lability
- Surgeries that are expected to last longer than 3 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Izmir, İzmir, 35170, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Mosaffa F, Gharaei B, Qoreishi M, Razavi S, Safari F, Fathi M, Mohseni G, Elyasi H, Hosseini F. Do the Concentration and Volume of Local Anesthetics Affect the Onset and Success of Infraclavicular Anesthesia? Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Aug 22;5(4):e23963. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23963v2. eCollection 2015 Aug.
PMID: 26473102BACKGROUNDGonzalez AP, Bernucci F, Techasuk W, Pham K, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A randomized comparison between 3 combinations of volume and concentration of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):206-11. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318287fe53.
PMID: 23518863BACKGROUNDFenten MG, Schoenmakers KP, Heesterbeek PJ, Scheffer GJ, Stienstra R. Effect of local anesthetic concentration, dose and volume on the duration of single-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with mepivacaine: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Sep 30;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0110-0.
PMID: 26423050BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zeki T Tekgul, MD
Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2016
First Posted
July 1, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share