NCT02793401

Brief Summary

The investigators aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of High Intensity LASER Therapy (HILT) and Ultrasound (US) treatment in chronic shoulder pain. It's a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind study.141 patients were randomized into two groups, as HILT (n=71) and US (n=70) groups. HILT or US treatment was applied to the patients in addition to 14 sessions of Hotpack (Hp) + Balneotherapy + Exercise treatment. Pre-treatment (Pre-T), Post-treatment 1st day (Post-T1st day) and Post-T findings for the 30th day (Post-T 30th day) were recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) scoring.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
141

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2016

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

May 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

High Intensity LaserUltrasoundChronic Shoulder Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • VAS

    Patients were evaluated using by visual analog scale(VAS) in pre-treatment (Pre-T), 15th day and 45th day. VAS is a frequently used test worldwide, for which reliability and safety studies have been performed.

    Change from Baseline in VAS scores at 15 days and 45 days

  • SPADI

    Patients were evaluated using SPADI in pre-treatment (Pre-T), 15th day and 45th day. SPADI was developed to measure shoulder discomfort. Its evaluation includes two parts: pain and disability. Part 1 includes five questions in the pain subgroup and measures the pain experienced by the patient over the previous week using VAS (0 no pain, to 10,most severe pain). Part 2 is the disability subgroup and includes eight questions and measures the degree of difficulty (0 no difficulty, to 10, requires help) in the movements of the patient during the last week. SPADI includes 13 questions, and zero point refers to maximal well-being and 130 points refers to maximal sickness.The investigators evaluated each part of the SPADI (shoulder pain index (SPI), shoulder disability index (SDI) and total SPADI) separately.

    Change from Baseline in SPADI scores at 15 days and 45 days.

Study Arms (2)

HILT group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

71 of the patients were in the HILT group

Device: Hıgh İntensity Laser (HILT)Device: HotpackDevice: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationOther: Therapeutic exercisesOther: Balneotherapy

US Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

70 of the patients were in the US group.

Device: UltrasoundDevice: HotpackDevice: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationOther: Therapeutic exercisesOther: Balneotherapy

Interventions

HILT was performed using a BTL-6000 High Intensity Laser, 12 W(watt), 1064 nm device was a hot laser with Nd: YAG LASER source. In HILT group, the investigators applied the device on the shoulder area in two phases: phase I - analgesia, and phase II - biostimulation.

HILT group

BTL 4710 US device was applied at 3 MHz frequency, and 1.5watt/cm2 intensity over 25 cm2 surface area. Headpiece area of the device was 5 cm2, and the application was performed as the head of device was positioned at 90º (perpendicular) at full contact for 5 minutes by using gel, and performing continuous circular motions.

US Group
HotpackDEVICE

All patients had the same physical therapy (PT) protocol including hot pack (HP) for 20 min/session,

HILT groupUS Group

All patients had the same physical therapy (PT) protocol includingTENS (Fizyotens 4000, Fizyomed Medical Devices Ltd,Turkey) (50-100 Hz) for 20 min/session,

Also known as: TENS
HILT groupUS Group

All patients had the same physical therapy (PT) protocol including therapeutic exercises for shoulder muscles

HILT groupUS Group

All patients had the same physical therapy (PT) protocol including balneotherapy in 38-40 °C thermomineralized water for 20 minutes.

HILT groupUS Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The presence of shoulder pain for more than 3 months patients.

You may not qualify if:

  • Limitation in the shoulder movements of more than 20%,
  • Receiving physical therapy and injection treatment to the same shoulder region in the previous year,
  • Malignancy,
  • The presence of radicular pain and cervical myofascial pain syndrome,
  • A history of acute trauma,
  • A prior history of fracture in the shoulder to be treated,
  • A prior history of surgical intervention and implantation of a metal implant to the affected shoulder,
  • Inflammatory rheumatoid disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Bursa, 16320, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

UltrasonographyTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationExercise TherapyBalneology

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisElectric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient Care

Study Officials

  • Burcu Metin Ökmen, MD

    Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Korgün Ökmen, MD

    Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kağan Özkuk, MD

    Abant İzzet Baysal Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Bilal Uysal, MD

    Abant İzzet Baysal Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Refia Sezer, MD

    Abant İzzet Baysal Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Engin Koyuncu, MD

    Ankara Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2016

First Posted

June 8, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations