NCT02814279

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare clinical, esthetic and patient-centered outcomes of coronally advanced tunnel (TUN) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both associated with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recession.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2016

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 7, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2016

Results QC Date

May 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Defect Coverage

    Percentage mean (%) of root surface covered by the surgical treatment, measured through a periodontal probe.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Root Coverage Esthetic Score

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

CAF plus connective tissue graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

CAF treatment was performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision was made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap was raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. The connective tissue graft was removed from the palate according to Bruno technique (1994) and sutured in position. Sling sutures were placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position 2 mm above the CEJ, followed by interrupted sutures to close the releasing incisions.

Procedure: CAF plus connective tissue graftDrug: Sodium dipyroneDrug: chlorhexidine rinse

Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

EXPERIMENTAL

The tunnel flap was performed according to Zuhr et al., 2007. Following initial sulcular incisions, spit thickness flap was prepared using specific tunneling knives beyond the mucogingival junction and until flap gain mobility. The flap was laterally extended to adjacent papillae that were carefully detached by means of a full-thickness preparation. The connective tissue graft was insert into the tunnel. Sling sutures were performed involving the flap and graft to coronally cover 2 mm above the CEJ.

Procedure: Tunnel plus connective tissue graftDrug: Sodium dipyroneDrug: chlorhexidine rinse

Interventions

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the trapezoidal flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Also known as: Periodontal plastic surgery
CAF plus connective tissue graft

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the tunnel flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Also known as: Periodontal plastic surgery
Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

All participants were instructed to take 500 mg sodium dipyrone just in case of pain.

Also known as: Drug prescription
CAF plus connective tissue graftTunnel plus connective tissue graft

All participants were instructed to perform 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse after the surgical procedures.

Also known as: Drug prescription
CAF plus connective tissue graftTunnel plus connective tissue graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars
  • Visible cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with pulp vitality;
  • Patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤20%;
  • Patients older than 18 years old; probing depth ˂3 mm in the included teeth;
  • Patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients presenting systemic problems that would contraindicate the surgical procedure;
  • Patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure;
  • Smokers or pregnant women;
  • Patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest;
  • Patients with orthodontic therapy in progress.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Mar;34(3):262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01039.x.

    PMID: 17309597BACKGROUND
  • Zuhr O, Fickl S, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Hurzeler MB. Covering of gingival recessions with a modified microsurgical tunnel technique: case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Oct;27(5):457-63.

    PMID: 17990442BACKGROUND
  • Bruno JF. Connective tissue graft technique assuring wide root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Apr;14(2):126-37.

    PMID: 7928129BACKGROUND
  • Santamaria MP, Neves FLDS, Silveira CA, Mathias IF, Fernandes-Dias SB, Jardini MAN, Tatakis DN. Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 May;44(5):540-547. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12714. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Interventions

Drug Prescriptions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drug TherapyTherapeuticsPrescriptionsPharmaceutical ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Mauro P. Santamaria
Organization
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos (Unesp)

Study Officials

  • Mauro P Santamaria, PhD

    ICT-UNESP

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2016

First Posted

June 27, 2016

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

May 15, 2020

Results First Posted

June 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2020-04