NCT02810080

Brief Summary

A randomized, multi-center trial involving critically-ill patients comparing conventional, manual control of inspired oxygen (FiO2) within a target range, with a computer-controlled, closed-loop FiO2 delivery using a continuous ventilator.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

June 20, 2016

Results QC Date

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Relative Duration With Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Within Target Range [Time Frame: 12 Hours]

    Relative duration is (time within SpO2 target of 92-96%)/12 hours where higher value demonstrates better ability of FiO2 control method to maintain appropriate oxygen saturation. Relative time the patient's SpO2 was maintained within target over the 12 hours on the study device, calculated as total time each patient had SpO2 within the 92 - 96% range divided by 12 hours with arcsin square root transformation

    12 hours

  • Number of Participants With SpO2 Less Than 88% at Anytime While on Study Device

    Number of participants with SpO2 less than 88% at anytime while on study device

    24 hours after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Relative Duration of Time With SpO2 92 to 96% When FiO2 is Greater Than 21% and SpO2 is Greater Than or Equal to 92% When Fi02 "Relative Duration With Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Within Target Range [Time Frame: 12 Hours]

    12 hours

Study Arms (2)

Closed Loop Control Ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

automatic adjustment of the ZOLL 731 ventilator FiO2 by the closed loop control software

Device: Closed Loop Control Ventilation

Manual Control Ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

manual adjustment of the ZOLL 731 ventilator FiO2 by the treatment team based on physician order

Device: Manual Control Ventilation

Interventions

Closed loop control ventilation using ZOLL 731 ventilator with physiologic closed-loop control software

Closed Loop Control Ventilation

Manual control ventilation using ZOLL 731 ventilator

Manual Control Ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject's legally authorized representative will provide signed and dated informed consent.
  • Age 18 - 65, inclusive.
  • Admission to a surgical or neurosurgical intensive care unit following traumatic injury or acute surgical illness
  • Requirement for endotracheal intubation
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • Patient is currently receiving inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) \>=40%

You may not qualify if:

  • Age under 18 or over 65
  • Isolated or severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale = 6 or less) with expected survival less than 24 hours
  • Brain death
  • Anticipated survival less than 48 hours
  • Pregnant female
  • Patient in whom a pulse oximeter cannot detect a reliable signal due to hypotension, hypothermia, or other injury
  • Known carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Uncontrolled diabetic
  • Patient who is unable to maintain SpO2 level of 88% at an FiO2 of 100% due to their medical condition. (NOTE: Being in the trial would impose no additional risk to a patient who presents with this condition however, data from a patient presenting with this pathophysiology would not provide insight into the performance of the controller as it would simply maintain that patient on an FiO2 of 100%.)
  • Patient with chronic hypercarbia.
  • Patient where a physician believes that FiO2 PCLC could be detrimental to the management of the patient.
  • Prisoner
  • SpO2 to SaO2 difference \>4%
  • Patient with core temperature \<35 C

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Regions Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and InjuriesRespiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nathan Burkhart
Organization
ZOLL

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2016

First Posted

June 22, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

August 15, 2024

Results First Posted

August 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations