A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-ranging Study Followed by an Observational Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
2 other identifiers
interventional
182
13 countries
71
Brief Summary
The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2016
71 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 19, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 30, 2021
CompletedJune 30, 2021
June 1, 2021
2 years
June 14, 2016
April 19, 2021
June 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) (mNRI) Response Across 3 Doses of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) and Placebo (PBO) at Week 24
The primary efficacy variable was assessed by establishing if there was a dose response relationship between BICLA response at Week 24 and dose, using Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod). Four candidate dose-response models were evaluated: a linear model, a logistic model, and 2 Emax models, and the MCP-Mod methodology controlled for multiplicity. BICLA response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: 1. BILAG 2004 improvement: A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤ 1 new B. 2. No worsening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score. 3. No worsening in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), defined as \< 10 millimeter (mm) increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). 4. No disallowed changes in concomitant medications, mainly including increases in corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and antimalarials.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (57)
The Percentage of Participants With BICLA (mNRI) Response in the Individual Dose Groups at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs)
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) of Interest
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Withdrew of Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
- +52 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
DZP dose 1
EXPERIMENTALDapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 1 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
DZP dose 2
EXPERIMENTALDapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 2 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
DZP dose 3
EXPERIMENTALDapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 3 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) confirmed by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria
- Moderate to severe SLE disease activity
- Evidence for at least 1 of the following SLE markers:
- Anti-dsDNA antibodies confirmed by central laboratory or
- Low complement confirmed by central laboratory or
- Antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer of \>= 1:80 in combination with at least 1 of the following: Historical positivity for anti-dsDNA or Positivity for extractable nuclear antigen (anti-ENA) confirmed by central laboratory
- The subject is receiving stable SLE standard-of-care medication
You may not qualify if:
- Mixed connective tissue disease, scleroderma, and/or overlap syndromes of SLE
- Subjects with severe neuropsychiatric SLE or other neurological symptoms that in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from completing protocol required procedures and assessments.
- New or worsening Class III or IV lupus nephritis
- Chronic kidney failure stage 3b
- Evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, agammaglobulinemias, T-cell deficiencies, or human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 infection at any time prior to or during the study
- Clinically significant active or latent infection (eg. chronic viral hepatitis B or C)
- Known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or latent TB (LTB) infection
- Live/live attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to the first study drug infusion (Visit 2) or who plan to receive these vaccines during the study or 12 weeks after the final dose of study drug
- History of thromboembolic events within 12 months of screening
- Subject has used protocol defined prohibited medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (71)
Sl0023 312
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Sl0023 307
El Cajon, California, 92020, United States
Sl0023 309
El Cajon, California, 92020, United States
Sl0023 323
Huntington Beach, California, 92646, United States
Sl0023 311
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Sl0023 314
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360, United States
Sl0023 302
Upland, California, 91786, United States
Sl0023 326
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
Sl0023 304
Clearwater, Florida, 33765, United States
Sl0023 322
DeBary, Florida, 32713, United States
Sl0023 321
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Sl0023 301
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014, United States
Sl0023 319
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
Sl0023 310
Tampa, Florida, 33603, United States
Sl0023 324
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303, United States
Sl0023 327
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
Sl0023 320
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Sl0023 306
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87104, United States
Sl0023 313
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
Sl0023 305
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73101, United States
Sl0023 315
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305, United States
Sl0023 308
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Sl0023 317
Amarillo, Texas, 79124, United States
Sl0023 303
Houston, Texas, 77034, United States
Sl0023 328
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
Sl0023 101
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Sl0023 102
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Sl0023 202
Providencia, Chile
Sl0023 203
Providencia, Chile
Sl0023 201
Puerto Varas, Chile
Sl0023 204
Viña del Mar, Chile
Sl0023 213
Barranquilla, Colombia
Sl0023 212
Bogotá, Colombia
Sl0023 214
Bogotá, Colombia
Sl0023 216
Bucaramanga, Colombia
Sl0023 211
Chía, Colombia
Sl0023 215
Medellín, Colombia
Sl0023 341
Hanover, Germany
Sl0023 113
Leipzig, Germany
Sl0023 124
Debrecen, Hungary
Sl0023 225
Guadalajara, Mexico
Sl0023 224
León, Mexico
Sl0023 221
México, Mexico
Sl0023 222
San Luis Potosí City, Mexico
Sl0023 232
Arequipa, Peru
Sl0023 231
Lima, Peru
Sl0023 234
Lima, Peru
Sl0023 235
Lima, Peru
Sl0023 133
Bytom, Poland
Sl0023 138
Lodz, Poland
Sl0023 136
Lublin, Poland
Sl0023 131
Poznan, Poland
Sl0023 134
Sosnowiec, Poland
Sl0023 135
Warsaw, Poland
Sl0023 146
Brasov, Romania
Sl0023 142
Bucharest, Romania
Sl0023 144
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Sl0023 141
Galati, Romania
Sl0023 157
Kazan', Russia
Sl0023 156
Kemerovo, Russia
Sl0023 152
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Sl0023 155
Voronezh, Russia
Sl0023 151
Yaroslavl, Russia
Sl0023 153
Yekaterinburg, Russia
Sl0023 161
Barcelona, Spain
Sl0023 162
Madrid, Spain
Sl0023 166
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Sl0023 172
Kyiv, Ukraine
Sl0023 175
Kyiv, Ukraine
Sl0023 171
Odesa, Ukraine
Sl0023 173
Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Related Publications (2)
Acharya C, Magnusson MO, Vajjah P, Oliver R, Zamacona M. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response for Dapirolizumab Pegol From a Phase 2b Trial in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr;63(4):435-444. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2188. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
PMID: 36453450DERIVEDMorel T, Cano S, Bartlett SJ, Gordon C, Haier B, Regnault A, Schneider M, Stach C, Cleanthous S. The FATIGUE-PRO: a new patient-reported outcome instrument to quantify fatigue in patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3329-3340. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab920.
PMID: 34897375DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- UCB
- Organization
- Cares
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
UCB Cares
+1 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2016
First Posted
June 17, 2016
Study Start
June 2, 2016
Primary Completion
May 31, 2018
Study Completion
November 19, 2018
Last Updated
June 30, 2021
Results First Posted
June 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06