NCT02800161

Brief Summary

The ongoing research on bipolar disorder (BD) has highlighted its pervasive and debilitating nature, characterized by lifelong recurrent episodes and residual intraepisodic symptomatology. Epidemiologic, comorbidity, cost-of illness, and mortality studies have reported dramatic illness-associated morbidity and premature mortality in bipolar patients. The efficacy and safety of antidepressant drug treatment in BD is the subject of long-standing debate based on a scientific literature that is limited and inconsistent. The evidence base for the use of antidepressant drugs in BD is strikingly weak, and there is insufficient evidence for treatment benefits with antidepressants combined with mood stabilizers. The need to develop new agents for the treatment of depression, and in particular bipolar depression, with better efficacy and/or tolerability, remains unmet. In the past years there has been increasing interest in the health benefits of supplemental and/or dietary substances in the treatment and prevention of depression. The disaccharide trehalose protects cells from hypoxic and anoxic injury and suppresses protein aggregation. In vivo studies with trehalose show cellular and behavioural beneficial effects in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, trehalose was shown to enhance autophagy, a process that had been recently suggested to be involved in the therapeutic action of antidepressant and mood-stabilizing drugs. In fact, trehalose may have antidepressant-like properties and that the trehalose induced behavioral changes are possibly related to trehalose effects to enhance autophagy. Furthermore, preliminary data indicates that trehalose also augments lithium effects in animal models (mice). Based on this hypothesis, this project aims to conduct a study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of trehalose as adjunctive treatment to lithium in bipolar depression.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2016

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2016

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Primary Outcome: efficacy assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    The primary outcome measure is evaluation of efficacy in terms of the mean change from baseline in the total score of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after the 8 weeks of the study.

    Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)

  • Primary Outcome: efficacy assessed with the Hamilton Rating scale for Depression (HAMD)

    The primary outcome measure is evaluation of efficacy in terms of the mean change from baseline in the total score of the Hamilton Rating scale for Depression (HAMD) after the 8 weeks of the study.

    Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale).

    Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)

  • Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the HAMD (Hamilton Rating scale for Depression).

    Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)

  • Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the CGI-BP (Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Disorder).

    Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)

Study Arms (2)

Trehalose

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Trehalose 70g/die

Drug: Trehalose

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Maltose 70g/die

Drug: Maltose

Interventions

Trehalose 70g/die

Trehalose

Maltose 70g/die

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Bipolar I and II patients aged between 18 and 65.
  • Bipolar disorder type I or II and a current major depressive episode (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) ≥18.
  • Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP)≥4.
  • All patients need to be receiving lithium at a steady dose (0.5-1.2 mmol/L) during at least 2 weeks prior to the study.
  • Other mood stabilizers added to lithium are permitted but at steady dose during at least 2 weeks prior to the study.
  • Other psychopharmacological treatments should be at stable dose 2 weeks prior to the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • A severe personality disorder suggesting noncompliance.
  • Diabetes Mellitus, any severe neurologic or other somatic illness and the use of somatic medication that could influence the mood.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder

Interventions

TrehaloseMaltose

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bipolar and Related DisordersMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlucansPolysaccharidesCarbohydratesDisaccharidesOligosaccharidesSugars

Study Officials

  • Eduard Vieta, MD,PhD

    Principal Investigator CIBER

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2016

First Posted

June 15, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2022

Study Completion

October 1, 2022

Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations