Trehalose as add-on Therapy in Bipolar Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ongoing research on bipolar disorder (BD) has highlighted its pervasive and debilitating nature, characterized by lifelong recurrent episodes and residual intraepisodic symptomatology. Epidemiologic, comorbidity, cost-of illness, and mortality studies have reported dramatic illness-associated morbidity and premature mortality in bipolar patients. The efficacy and safety of antidepressant drug treatment in BD is the subject of long-standing debate based on a scientific literature that is limited and inconsistent. The evidence base for the use of antidepressant drugs in BD is strikingly weak, and there is insufficient evidence for treatment benefits with antidepressants combined with mood stabilizers. The need to develop new agents for the treatment of depression, and in particular bipolar depression, with better efficacy and/or tolerability, remains unmet. In the past years there has been increasing interest in the health benefits of supplemental and/or dietary substances in the treatment and prevention of depression. The disaccharide trehalose protects cells from hypoxic and anoxic injury and suppresses protein aggregation. In vivo studies with trehalose show cellular and behavioural beneficial effects in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, trehalose was shown to enhance autophagy, a process that had been recently suggested to be involved in the therapeutic action of antidepressant and mood-stabilizing drugs. In fact, trehalose may have antidepressant-like properties and that the trehalose induced behavioral changes are possibly related to trehalose effects to enhance autophagy. Furthermore, preliminary data indicates that trehalose also augments lithium effects in animal models (mice). Based on this hypothesis, this project aims to conduct a study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of trehalose as adjunctive treatment to lithium in bipolar depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
August 1, 2021
6.3 years
May 9, 2016
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Outcome: efficacy assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
The primary outcome measure is evaluation of efficacy in terms of the mean change from baseline in the total score of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after the 8 weeks of the study.
Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)
Primary Outcome: efficacy assessed with the Hamilton Rating scale for Depression (HAMD)
The primary outcome measure is evaluation of efficacy in terms of the mean change from baseline in the total score of the Hamilton Rating scale for Depression (HAMD) after the 8 weeks of the study.
Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale).
Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)
Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the HAMD (Hamilton Rating scale for Depression).
Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)
Secondary Outcome: response to treatment defined as a reduction of at least 50% on the CGI-BP (Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Disorder).
Mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 8)
Study Arms (2)
Trehalose
ACTIVE COMPARATORTrehalose 70g/die
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORMaltose 70g/die
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bipolar I and II patients aged between 18 and 65.
- Bipolar disorder type I or II and a current major depressive episode (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) ≥18.
- Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP)≥4.
- All patients need to be receiving lithium at a steady dose (0.5-1.2 mmol/L) during at least 2 weeks prior to the study.
- Other mood stabilizers added to lithium are permitted but at steady dose during at least 2 weeks prior to the study.
- Other psychopharmacological treatments should be at stable dose 2 weeks prior to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- A severe personality disorder suggesting noncompliance.
- Diabetes Mellitus, any severe neurologic or other somatic illness and the use of somatic medication that could influence the mood.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eduard Vieta, MD,PhD
Principal Investigator CIBER
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2016
First Posted
June 15, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share