AFrican Resuscitation Ultrasound In Critically-ill Adults
AFRICA
Pilot Study- Ultrasound-guided Resuscitation of Patients Presenting With Shock or Dyspnea to the Emergency Department in a Resource-limited Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study is a prospective cohort study in which a select group of emergency physicians at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Ghana will be trained in cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS). Following the training, patients who present to the ED with undifferentiated shock and/or dyspnea will either receive usual and customary care supplemented with cardiopulmonary ultrasonography-guided diagnosis and treatment during their initial resuscitation, or usual and customary care alone depending on whether the treating physician has received CPUS training. The main outcomes is the impact of CPUS on correct diagnosis. Information regarding initial treatment strategies, diagnoses and 24-hour mortality will be collected via manual review of paper charts and medical records.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 23, 2017
February 1, 2017
6 months
May 23, 2016
February 22, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with correct diagnosis after initial evaluation in the emergency department
Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed by comparing the initial diagnosis, documented on the "second diagnosis checklist" within one hour of first physician contact in the emergency department, and final diagnosis as documented in the patient's chart at the time of discharge or death.
Upon discharge from ED or at 24 hours, whichever comes first
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The amount of IV fluids given to the patient in the emergency department and whether or not the following therapies were employed: invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, diuretics, bronchodilators, and vasopressors
Upon discharge from ED or at 24 hours, whichever comes first
Number of patients alive
At 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
CPUS group
EXPERIMENTALThe group of patients in the CPUS group will be those who receive a cardiopulmonary ultrasound exam in accordance with a specified CPUS scanning protocol in addition to their routine care. Patients will be in this group if their treating physician has received specific training in the CPUS protocol.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe group of patients in the control group will be those who do not receive an ultrasound exam in accordance with a specified CPUS scanning protocol in addition to their routine care. Patients will be in this group if their treating physician has not received specific training in the CPUS protocol.
Interventions
The cardiopulmonary ultrasound exam consists of a point-of-care ultrasound scan of the heart, lungs, peritoneal cavity, aorta, and femoral veins.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of at least one of the following signs or symptoms of hypoperfusion or hypoxia:
- Unresponsiveness or altered mental status with a GCS \<13
- Diaphoresis
- Capillary refill \>3 seconds
- Systolic blood pressure \<100 at any point between arrival to the ED and IV fluid administration
- Tachycardia \>100 bpm
- Tachypnea \>20/min
- Pulse oximetry of \<92% at any point between arrival to the ED and administration of supplemental oxygen
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic low blood pressure, as evidenced by patient report or documentation
- ACS, determined by ST elevation on EKG (troponin levels not easily available at study site)
- Significant resuscitative measures prior to enrollment, including defibrillation, ALS medications, or mechanical ventilation
- Determination of etiology of shock prior to enrollment, such as obvious signs of major trauma or obvious GI bleeding
- Onset of signs or symptoms of shock after initial evaluation by a physician
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rockefeller Otenglead
- Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technologycollaborator
- Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital
Kumasi, 00233, Ghana
Related Publications (2)
Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;28(1):29-56, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.010.
PMID: 19945597BACKGROUNDLichtenstein DA, Meziere GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2800. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
PMID: 18403664BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rockefeller Oteng, MD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2016
First Posted
June 9, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share