NCT02792933

Brief Summary

Epidural space localization using loss of resistance technique with air (ALOR) is controversial in obstetric analgesia due to a minor efficacy and risk of complications, compared with loss of resistance technique with saline (SLOR). This randomized prospective study will compare the efficacy and incidence of most common complications of both techniques in obstetric analgesia.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2010

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2016

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 15, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Analgesia obtained 30 minutes after the puncture of the epidural block (variation of pain score)

    30 min

Study Arms (2)

air in epidural space

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

When the ALOR epidural localization technique will be used, an intermittent pressure with fast movements will be exerted on the plunger of the syringe while the Tuohy needle will be inserted until loss of resistance was felt.

Procedure: air in epidural space

saline in epidural space

EXPERIMENTAL

When the SLOR technique is used, a continuous pressure will be exerted on the plunger of the Tuohy needle until loss of resistance was felt.

Procedure: saline in epidural space

Interventions

The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be then withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of air will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.

air in epidural space

The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of saline solution will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.

saline in epidural space

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Parturients asking for epidural analgesia during labour .
  • Age between 18 and 45 years.
  • Spontaneous or induced.
  • Cervical dilatation inferior to 6 cm.
  • Written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Infection in the puncture site.
  • Refusal of the patient.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Severe hypovolaemia.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Severe aortic or mitral stenosis.
  • Systemic infection.
  • Non collaborating patient.
  • Incapacity of communicating or lack of comprehension of the study by the parturient
  • Prior neurological symptoms or demyelinising lesions.
  • Valvular stenosis.
  • Severe spinal deviation.
  • Patient previously operated of spinal surgery in the site of puncture.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Antibas PL, do Nascimento Junior P, Braz LG, Vitor Pereira Doles J, Modolo NS, El Dib R. Air versus saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 18;2014(7):CD008938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008938.pub2.

    PMID: 25033878BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

AirInjections, EpiduralSodium Chloride

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AtmosphereEnvironmentEcological and Environmental PhenomenaBiological PhenomenaMeteorological ConceptsEnvironment and Public HealthInjections, SpinalInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2016

First Posted

June 8, 2016

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

February 1, 2010

Study Completion

June 1, 2010

Last Updated

June 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share