Air Versus Saline Solution for the Localization of the Epidural Space in Labour Analgesia
Localization of the Epidural Space Using the Loss of Resistance Technique for Labour Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Air Versus Saline Solution
1 other identifier
interventional
400
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Epidural space localization using loss of resistance technique with air (ALOR) is controversial in obstetric analgesia due to a minor efficacy and risk of complications, compared with loss of resistance technique with saline (SLOR). This randomized prospective study will compare the efficacy and incidence of most common complications of both techniques in obstetric analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2016
CompletedJune 15, 2016
June 1, 2016
7 months
May 10, 2016
June 14, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Analgesia obtained 30 minutes after the puncture of the epidural block (variation of pain score)
30 min
Study Arms (2)
air in epidural space
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhen the ALOR epidural localization technique will be used, an intermittent pressure with fast movements will be exerted on the plunger of the syringe while the Tuohy needle will be inserted until loss of resistance was felt.
saline in epidural space
EXPERIMENTALWhen the SLOR technique is used, a continuous pressure will be exerted on the plunger of the Tuohy needle until loss of resistance was felt.
Interventions
The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be then withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of air will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.
The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of saline solution will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parturients asking for epidural analgesia during labour .
- Age between 18 and 45 years.
- Spontaneous or induced.
- Cervical dilatation inferior to 6 cm.
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Infection in the puncture site.
- Refusal of the patient.
- Coagulopathy.
- Severe hypovolaemia.
- Intracranial hypertension.
- Severe aortic or mitral stenosis.
- Systemic infection.
- Non collaborating patient.
- Incapacity of communicating or lack of comprehension of the study by the parturient
- Prior neurological symptoms or demyelinising lesions.
- Valvular stenosis.
- Severe spinal deviation.
- Patient previously operated of spinal surgery in the site of puncture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Antibas PL, do Nascimento Junior P, Braz LG, Vitor Pereira Doles J, Modolo NS, El Dib R. Air versus saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 18;2014(7):CD008938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008938.pub2.
PMID: 25033878BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2016
First Posted
June 8, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share