Study Stopped
Difficulty with patient recruitment.
Hemodynamic Effects of Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We propose to study the effects on hemodynamics (blood pressure, cardiac output, and central venous pressure) of two doses of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a higher dose of 12 mg to a lower dose of 4.5 mg. We will examine recovery times, incidence of hypotension, and compare pain control and maternal satisfaction during and after cesarean section. We hypothesize that low dose bupivacaine spinal anesthesia will provide equivalent anesthesia for cesarean section compared to conventional dose bupivacaine, with less hypotension, faster recovery time, and enhanced maternal satisfaction. Maternal satisfaction will be assessed by self-reported pain scores, incidence of nausea and vomiting, shivering, and ability to interact with baby in the OR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 8, 2016
May 1, 2016
7 months
September 26, 2013
November 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recovery room length of stay
The primary endpoint is the expected reduction in the Recovery Room length of stay. Based on a predicted 50-100% reduction in length of stay, alpha 0.05, power of 80%, and given an anticipated drop-out rate of 10%, a sample size of n = 20 study patients per group is required.
Current recovery room average length of stay is 4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hemodynamics
Average duration of surgery is 100 minutes
Other Outcomes (4)
Maternal satisfaction scores
Average duration of recovery room stay is 4 hours.
Bromage Scores
Average recovery room length of stay is 4 hours
Sensory Levels
Average recovery room length of stay is 4 hours
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Low Dose Spinal
EXPERIMENTALHyperbaric bupivacaine 4.5mg with fentanyl 15mcg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be positioned right side down and head down 20-30 degrees for the dural puncture and then positioned supine in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. The OR table will be kept in 20-30 degrees head down for the cesarean section.
Control Spinal Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHyperbaric bupivacaine 1.2cc (9mg) with fentanyl 15mcg and preservative free morphine 150mcg. The patient will be in the sitting position for the dural puncture and then positioned supine, in the left lateral tilt position after the anesthetic solution has been given. Once block height has been established the patient will be placed in 20-30 degrees trendelenberg for the cesarean section.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult females having elective, repeat cesarean sections who have given informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to dural puncture
- BMI \>40
- Elective C/S presenting in labour or with rupture of membranes
- Placenta previa or accrete
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen E Kowalski, MD
University of Manitoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2013
First Posted
January 15, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05