Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine in Myeloma
ViGeM
A Randomized Evaluation of Vinorelbine Versus Gemcitabine for Mobilization of Peripheral Stem Cells in Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.
1 other identifier
interventional
136
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the efficacy of gemcitabine is comparable with the efficacy of the standard chemotherapy with vinorelbine for mobilization of autologous stem cells in myeloma patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
Started Mar 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedApril 3, 2018
March 1, 2018
3.8 years
June 1, 2016
March 31, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CD34+ (cluster of differentiation 34) peripheral blood stem cells
Number of patients with collection of \> 6 million CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells/kg body weight at day 8 after vinorelbine versus gemcitabine chemotherapy
Day 8
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Rate of peripheral neuropathy
Between 15 and 30 days
Severity of peripheral neuropathy
Between 15 and 30 days
Hematologic recovery
Between 15 and 30 days
Minimal residual disease in the peripheral blood
Day 8
Need to use the stem cell releasing compound Plerixafor
Day 8
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mobilisation Chemotherapy: Vinorelbine
ACTIVE COMPARATORVinorelbine is given at a standard dose of 35mg/m2 i.v. at day 1 as an infusion over 10 minutes, on an ambulatory basis.
Mobilisation Chemotherapy: Gemcitabine
EXPERIMENTALGemcitabine is given at the standard dose of 1250 mg/m2 i.v. in 500ml NaCl 0.9% (sodium chloride) as an infusion over 30 minutes, on an ambulatory basis.
Interventions
Mobilisation Chemotherapy
Mobilisation Chemotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic myeloma or amyloidosis patients after standard first-line induction treatment. Patients must be fit for subsequent consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan with autologous stem cell support.
- Standard induction chemotherapy comprises regimens including thalidomide, bortezomib, or lenalidomide (less than 5 cycles), alone or in combination with dexamethasone. Combinations of novel agents are allowed as well as induction with the VAD (vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone) regimen.
- Patient must be aged 18-75 years, with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) \< 3, and has given voluntary written informed consent.
- Patient has the following laboratory values at baseline:
- Platelets count \> 50 x 109/l without transfusion support within 7 days before the laboratory test.
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1.0 x 109/l without the use of colony stimulating factors.
- Creatinine-clearance \> 40 ml/min
- Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 14 days prior to registration for all women of childbearing potential. Patients of childbearing potential must implement adequate measures (hormonal treatment p.o. or i.m., intra uterine surgical devices, or latex condoms) to avoid pregnancy during study treatment and for additional 12 months. No pregnant or lactating patients are allowed.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy with lenalidomide.
- Patients not fit for autologous stem cell transplantation
- Patients with other serious medical condition that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol or that would impair tolerance to therapy or prolong hematological recovery.
- Subject is currently enrolled in another investigational trial or is receiving other investigational agent(s).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department for Medical Oncology; University Hospital/Inselspital
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, Casassus P, Maisonneuve H, Facon T, Ifrah N, Payen C, Bataille R. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 11;335(2):91-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607113350204.
PMID: 8649495BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas Pabst, MD
Inselspital , University Hospital Berne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2016
First Posted
June 6, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
April 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share