ConnectEd: A Randomized Controlled Trial Connecting Through Educational Training
ConnectEd
1 other identifier
interventional
3,178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized intervention pilot is to evaluate the relative efficacy of bystander training elements (delivery mode and integration of substance abuse prevention) among cohorts of incoming undergraduates at the University of Kentucky, a nationally recognized leader in addressing sexual violence through bystander intervention programming. Consenting students will be randomized to one of the following training conditions:
- 1.In-person Green Dot Intensive Bystander-based Sexual Violence Prevention Training (GreenDot);
- 2.In-person Green Dot Intensive Bystander Training combined with Substance Abuse Prevention Training;
- 3.Online Bystander-based Sexual Violence Prevention Training (Haven), and;
- 4.Online Substance Abuse Training (AlcoholEdu).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 24, 2020
February 1, 2020
3.6 years
May 20, 2016
February 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Bystander Behaviors
The primary outcome for this study is bystander behaviors as measured by the number of behaviors reported by students overall and by domain. Bystander behaviors are measured through reports of actual behaviors. These primary bystander behavior outcomes will be used to evaluate the relative efficacy of the intervention(s). As bystander behaviors require opportunity, these primary outcomes will be examined accounting for the presence of opportunity to bystand. The primary analysis will be the comparison of these outcomes over time using mixed models, with a particular interest on whether there is a condition by time interaction (time: baseline, 5 months post, 9 months post).
baseline, 5 months and 9 months
Change in Bystander Behavior Intentions Scale
Students will report their intention to engage in bystander behaviors. The scale used to report this is a five point Likert scale. Questions include measures such as, likelihood of becoming involved based on their relation to the individual and likelihood to report based on disciplinary actions. The changes that are measured throughout the academic year will be used to report intentions in bystander behavior.
baseline, about 5 months and 9 months
Change in Bystander Behavior Efficacy Scale
Students will report their self efficacy in their ability to preform bystander behaviors. The scale used to report this efficacy is a five point Likert scale. Questions include measures such as, self reported ability to recognize risky situations and reported skill set of prevention of violence behaviors. The changes that are measured throughout the academic year will be used to report efficacy in bystander behavior.
baseline, 5 months and 9 months
Count of Bystander Behaviors Engagement with Peers
Students will report bystander behaviors that they participated in with their peers. These are reported using multiple choice and open ended questions to describe the event and the action taken by an individual who engaged in a bystander behavior. Questions include what bystander action was preformed, where the incident occurred, and number of times this event occurred. The number of times students indicate these behaviors will be combined across surveys.
about 2 months, about 4 months, 5 months, about 7 months, and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Acceptance of SV/DV Scale
baseline, 5 months and 9 months
Count of self-reported risky behaviors, sexual and alcohol related
baseline, 5 months and 9 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Social media and campus communications (e.g., Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, myUK)
One Academic Year (9 months)
Study Arms (4)
Haven
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnline Bystander Training or Haven provides students with definitions and statistics associated with sexual assault and relationship violence, bystander skills and strategies, and campus policies and resources. The trainings are "personalized and reflective" and incorporate the student's "unique perspectives and experiences." This 45-minute training is mandatory and students are asked to complete a follow-up survey 45-days after the training. Because this training is mandatory for all incoming students, all students are expected to have exposure to this training.
AlcoholEdu
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnline Substance Abuse Training or AlcoholEdu provides confidential substance abuse education course which uses a science-based approach to educate students about alcohol and its effects. Whether the student drinks or not, the course will help them make informed decisions about alcohol and better deal with drinking behavior that may occur around them. AlcoholEdu is used by more than 500 colleges nationwide through EVERFi.
ConnectEd
EXPERIMENTALIn-person Combination Training provides Green Dot Intensive Bystander Training AND Substance Abuse Prevention cross-programming to develop ConnectED. The intentional coordination between substance abuse and violence prevention programming would include in-depth information related to interpersonal violence and substance use/abuse, activities to help participants explore their connection to these issues; information and activities related to the culture of violence, drinking and drug use and how everyone has a role in impacting that culture; information about bystander behaviors and barriers to taking action when they encounter problem situations; participant self-evaluation of their own attitudes, beliefs and biases around these issues; and, in-depth skill building activities to prepare participants to safely intervene in problem situations.
GreenDot
EXPERIMENTALIn-person Bystander Training provides Green Dot bystander intervention program (www.livethegreendot.com) seeks to empower potential bystanders (students) to actively engage their peers in violence prevention. Intensive bystander training involves interactive, skill development with role-play of bystander behaviors. This program focuses on building knowledge and skills related to interpersonal violence and being an active bystander. There is a structured curriculum for both introductory sessions and longer, skill-building sessions. While a Popular Opinion Leader strategy has been used in prior training, for this trial all incoming students randomized to this condition will be offered intensive bystander training. NOTE: Green Dot Speeches will be supplemental to Intensive Green Dot Bystander training. These speeches will continue to occur as usual. As the aim of this study is to compare bystander intensive training, we will not attempt to limit participation to Green Dot Speeches.
Interventions
Large groups of 120-150 students will complete Haven training via computer; training lasts duration of the online program.
Large groups of 120-150 students will complete EverFi training via computer; training lasts duration of the online program.
In-person training of large groups of 120-150 students; training lasts 3-4 hours
In-person training of large groups of 120-150 students; training lasts 3-4 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incoming University of Kentucky undergraduate students (2016, 2017)
You may not qualify if:
- Any current/non-incoming University of Kentucky student
- Any student primarily enrolled at another college or university
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Heather Bushlead
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0082, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather M Bush, PhD
University of Kentucky
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann L Coker, MPH, PhD
University of Kentucky
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Biostatistics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2016
First Posted
June 1, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share