Multi-College Bystander Efficacy Evaluation
Growing Researcher and College Communities Supporting Violence Prevention Research
1 other identifier
observational
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bystander interventions, recognized as promising violence prevention strategies, are unique in their engagement of all community members to 1) recognize situations that may become violent and 2) learn to safely and effectively intervene to reduce violence risk. Based on their promise, the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act (SaVE) now requires all publicly-funded colleges to provide bystander intervention. With SaVE's policy intervention requiring bystander interventions, a "natural experiment" has arisen to determine the relative efficacy of students' bystander training across multiple colleges. Investigators propose a quasi-experimental design (using fractional factorials) to evaluate the relative efficacy of three bystander interventions to reduce violence in college communities. Green Dot will be one of three bystander interventions evaluated. A recent rigorous evaluation has found that Green Dot is associated with a 20-40% reduction in VAW in college and high school settings. In aim 1, investigators will compare the relative efficacy of bystander interventions to a) increase bystander efficacy and behaviors, b) reduce violence acceptance, c) reduce interpersonal violence victimization and perpetration, and d) increase program cost effectiveness. The three main bystander groups compared will be: exclusively online training, Green Dot (speeches and intensive bystander training), and other skills-based bystander training. Program efficacy data will be obtained from student surveys, campus crime statistics, and surveys with college staff and administrators responsible for selecting and implementing bystander interventions. In aim 2, investigators seek to grow communities of VAW prevention researchers. Researcher communities will form through researchers' engagement with college recruitment, survey design, data collection and analyses. Specifically investigators will determine the efficacy of this program to increase VAW prevention research productivity defined as a) increasing research skills and b) increasing research communications measured as manuscript submissions, presentations, and publications. This natural experiment will generate new understanding into efficacy of how bystander programs work. This natural experiment will also provide the VAW research community an opportunity to increase our skill-sets and share our experiences with and help grow the next generation of VAW prevention researchers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 15, 2021
March 1, 2021
3.4 years
January 11, 2016
March 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Interpersonal Violence Victimization and Perpetration at the college level using AAU measures of sexual violence, dating violence, sexual harassment and stalking
Interpersonal Violence defined as sexual violence, partner violence, stalking and sexual harassment
Up to 60 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bystander behavior measures at the college level based on of Banyard, Plante & Monynihan bystanding scale
Up to 60 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Violence acceptance
Up to 60 months
Cost Measures
Up to 60 months
Study Arms (3)
Green Dot BIC 1
Bystander Intervention Components Clusters will include at least a component of Green Dot. E.g. Comparisons will be made across schools that have Green Dot versus those that don't have Green Dot. (BIC 1)
Online BIC 2
Bystander Intervention Components Clusters will include at least a component of online bystander training. E.g. Comparisons will be made across schools that have online bystander training versus those that do not. (BIC 2)
Alternative programs BIC 3
Bystander Intervention Components Clusters will include at least a component of Green Dot. E.g. Comparisons will be made across schools that have alternative program versus those that do not. (BIC 3)
Interventions
BIC cluster creation will include policy, implementation and degree of community coverage, specific title mandatory, and exclusively online training.
BIC cluster creation will include policy, implementation and degree of community coverage, specific title mandatory, and exclusively online training.
BIC cluster creation will include policy, implementation and degree of community coverage, specific title mandatory, and exclusively online training.
Eligibility Criteria
Public universities with junior faculty to be mentored in violence prevention Note: sampling unit for primary analyses is the college: answers to questions below refer to students clustered at each institution
You may qualify if:
- Public universities with junior faculty to be mentored in violence prevention
You may not qualify if:
- Private universities, institutions with less than 10,000 undergraduate students
- Undergraduate students at the public 4 year colleges or universities, ages 18-24
- Graduate or professional students, non-degree seeking or not enrolled
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ann Cokerlead
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0293, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann L Coker, PhD
University of Kentucky
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather M Bush, PhD
University of Kentucky
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Verizon Wireless Endowed Chair Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, in the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology, in the UK College of Public Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2016
First Posted
January 20, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share