Comparison of Continuous Wound Catheter Infusion Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion in Abdominal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of efficacy in management of pain in abdominal surgery between epidural versus wound infusion catheter {catheter placed within the incision site}
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 7, 2017
February 1, 2017
8 months
May 18, 2016
February 5, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS (Numerical Rating Score) in the two groups postoperatively
24 hrs post surgery
Study Arms (2)
Epidural catheter infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORepidural catheter in the thoracic vertebra level to provide local anesthetic infusion
Wound catheter infusion
EXPERIMENTALA multiorificed wound infusion catheter kept within the incision site to provide continuous local anesthetic infusion
Interventions
Wound catheter has multiple holes spread around 360 degrees throughout its active length. It is placed in the musculofascial plane during closure of the wound. Local anaesthetic infusion will be delivered through the catheter.
Epidural catheter will be placed in the level T7-T9 , and local anaesthetic infusion will be given
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA PS I-III , undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery involving upper midline incision
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to give consent.
- Contraindication to epidural analgesia (e.g.localized sepsis , Raised ICP , Myelopathy , Peripheral neuropathy ,Inherited coagulopathy)
- Addiction to opioids, or alcohol, or history of any other substance abuse.
- Allergy to local anaesthetic drugs.
- Pregnancy.
- Inability to communicate (e.g. known psychiatric disorders)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
PGIMER
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012, India
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arun Raja Thangavel, MBBS
Junior Resident , MD Anaesthesia and Intensive care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Junior Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2016
First Posted
May 25, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02