Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
OAGB-vs-LRYGB
Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study try to identify differences in cost, length of operation and results between two different bariatric surgical techniques, the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the Single anastomosis laparoscopic gastric bypass. The study will be conducted in a Spanish public health system hospital. The patients of the trial will have the preoperative studies, hospital treatment during the admission, postoperative treatment and follow up as any other patient included in the hospital bariatric surgery program. No new methods are applied other than randomly choose the surgical technique. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to each group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedApril 21, 2020
April 1, 2020
4.4 years
May 16, 2016
April 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Hospital Cost in euros
Total hospital expenses during admission for the surgery
up to 3 months
Length of operation in minutes
Duration of the surgical procedure
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (9)
weight loss in kilograms
3 months
weight loss in kilograms
6 months
weight loss in kilograms
9 months
weight loss in kilograms
12 months
weight loss in kilograms
18 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
through study completion an average of 5 year
Study Arms (2)
Minigastric bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention(s): The patient will have done a Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (minigastric bypass) at the time of the surgical procedure.
Gastric bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient will have a Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at the time of the surgical procedure
Interventions
The patient will be submitted to a minigastric bypass at the time of the operation
In this case a simplified conventional gastric bypass will be performed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- criteria for bariatric surgery published in 1991 for the National Institutes of Health of the USA.
- age between 18-65 years-old.
- BMI between 40-50 kg/m2
- Obesity for more than 5 years of evolution
- Fail in medical supervised weight loss program
- patient knowing of the mechanism of weight loss after surgery and agreement to collaborate with medical recommendations, diet, medical treatment, as well as the visit established in the follow up program
- patient accepting that surgery objective is not to achieve the ideal weight.
- signed specific informed consent
- women will agree in avoid gestation during one year after surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to sign the informed consent form because of a mental disorder.
- endocrine diseases causing obesity
- unstable mental disorder, evaluated for a psychiatry MD.
- high anesthetic risk making surgery too risky.
- Malignant neoplasm
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with endoscopic esophagitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Servicio de CirugĂa General. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Tsou JJ, Chen SC, Chen JC. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012 Dec;22(12):1827-34. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9.
PMID: 23011462BACKGROUNDRutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001 Jun;11(3):276-80. doi: 10.1381/096089201321336584.
PMID: 11433900BACKGROUNDLee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Wei PL, Huang MT. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98.
PMID: 15973097BACKGROUNDLee WJ, Lin YH. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence. Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1749-56. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1369-9.
PMID: 25056233BACKGROUNDPiche ME, Auclair A, Harvey J, Marceau S, Poirier P. How to choose and use bariatric surgery in 2015. Can J Cardiol. 2015 Feb;31(2):153-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
PMID: 25661550BACKGROUNDRamos AC, Silva AC, Ramos MG, Canseco EG, Galvao-Neto Mdos P, Menezes Mde A, Galvao TD, Bastos EL. Simplified gastric bypass: 13 years of experience and 12,000 patients operated. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):2-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100002.
PMID: 25409956BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Miguel J Garcia-Oria, MD PhD FACS
Unidad Cirugia Obesidad y Metabolica Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2016
First Posted
May 20, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The plan is to publish the results of our study in a scientific journal when it be completed, not to publish the individual patient data, just the global data comparing both groups of study.