Comparison of Mini Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
RYSA
Comparison of Two Operative Techniques - Mini Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Severe Obesity
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study compares Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with single anastomosis gastric bypass in a randomized prospective setting. This study also adresses the issue of bile reflux after MGB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
6.4 years
July 23, 2016
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weight-loss
Main outcome is weight-loss at 1 yewar after the operationoperation. Weight-loss is calculated as excess weight-loss compared to the preoperative weight 2 months before the operation.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Glucose homeostasis
Up to 12 months
Bile reflux after Mini Gastric Bypass
6 months
Weight-loss
10 years
Study Arms (2)
RYGB
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoux-en-Y gastric bypass
SAGB
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle anastomosis gastric bypass
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI\>35
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Previous bariatric surgery
- Anemia
- esophagitis (LA B-D)
- esophageal intestinal metaplasia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, 00029, Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland
Related Publications (3)
van der Kolk BW, Heinonen S, White JW, Wagner A, Karppinen JE, Saari S, Muniandy M, Metsikko S, Dillon ET, Groop PH, Saarinen T, Le Roux CW, Virtanen KA, Docherty NG, Pirinen E, Juuti A, Pietilainen KH. Human Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria Responses to Weight Loss Induced by Bariatric Surgery or Lifestyle Intervention. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2026 Feb;242(2):e70150. doi: 10.1111/apha.70150.
PMID: 41507695DERIVEDSaarinen T, Merilainen S, Koivukangas V, Pietilainen KH, Juuti A. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (the RYSA trial): trial protocol and interim analysis. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3898-y.
PMID: 31888729DERIVEDSaarinen T, Pietilainen KH, Loimaala A, Ihalainen T, Sammalkorpi H, Penttila A, Juuti A. Bile Reflux is a Common Finding in the Gastric Pouch After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):875-881. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04353-x.
PMID: 31853864DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tuure T Saarinen, MD
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2016
First Posted
August 30, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share