NCT02078934

Brief Summary

Incisional hernias occur in nearly 20% of all laparotomy incisions accounting for almost 400,000 ventral hernia repairs annually in the United States. There is an even higher incidence of incisional hernia recurrence after prior repair if the patient is obese. Each subsequent hernia repair leads to increased morbidity and durability. It is not infrequent that many surgeons will advise overweight or obese patients to lose substantial weight prior to complex incisional hernia repair. However, it is quite difficult for any individual to lose more than 8 pounds a month in a safe, rapid, and sustainable fashion. This is based on losing 2 lbs. per week utilizing diet and exercise alone. Many patients with incisional hernia are physically debilitated that they cannot engage in any substantial physical activity to lose weight. Traditional laparoscopic bariatric surgery (i.e. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and SG), while feasible, is a technically challenging endeavor since prior abdominal surgeries increase the amount of intra-abdominal adhesions. Furthermore, there is still a subset of patients who are not candidates for laparoscopic weight loss surgery because of inability to tolerate pneumoperitoneum due to underlying physiologic dysfunction. \- Novel minimally invasive endoscopic technique may help obese patients with an incisional hernia lose weight in a safe and rapid fashion. Early case reports and small case series on gastric bypass revision utilizing such endoscopic technique have shown promise in efficacious weight loss. There have been reports of achieving nearly 20-25% excess weight loss. Abu Dayyeh and colleagues have also demonstrated that endoscopic gastric plication as a primary weight loss procedure is feasible, but their reported follow-up was only 3 months.8 Brethauer, et al. from Cleveland Clinic performed transoral gastric volume reduction for weight management in 18 patients (TRIM TRIAL). They utilized the Restore Suturing System (Restore device) and reported a mean decrease in BMI of -4.0 ± 3.5 kg/m2. Mean excess weight loss was 27.7% ± 21.9% with no reports of adverse events.9 There have also been reports of not only weight loss but improved insulin sensitivity and secretion.10 Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication afforded a mean 50.7% excess weight loss at 12 months.11 The intent of this study is not to demonstrate endoscopic suturing to be a primary option for weight-loss surgery. Preliminary reports have shown such procedure is technically feasible but not durable and the effects of the procedure varied widely among the study participants.12 The investigators view this technology as a bridge for morbidly obese patients, who will need subsequent surgery for another surgical disease, to improve their body habitus and decrease their postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aims of the investigators study are:

  • Feasibility of endoscopic gastric sleeve plication
  • Define the technical aspects of endoscopic suturing for sleeve plication
  • Provide long-term follow-up for both weight loss and resolution of their co-morbidities
  • Time from the endoscopic procedure to their incisional hernia repair
  • Photographic evidence of the stomach after endoscopic plication during the incisional hernia repair There are several advantages for the proposed study. First it avoids entering the intra-abdominal cavity. Second, the procedure is performed solely with sutures obviating the need for stapling which may increase the risk of gastric leak from the staple line.13 Lastly, it avoids placing endoscopic intra-luminal devices such as intragastric balloons or duodenal-jejunal sleeves. Limiting factor of such devices is a high rate of premature device withdrawal due to intolerance. Furthermore, their effects are short-lived as most devices will need to be removed by 12 weeks and they only offer a mean 23.6% excess weight loss.13, 14 The implications of this study can be far-reaching. Once efficacy is demonstrated where enough weight loss is achieved that patients can safely and quickly undergo their incisional hernia surgery, the investigators can then conduct a retrospective case-control cross-matched study to further delineate its true benefit. If there is a true benefit, then a randomized control study can be employed in the future.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Surgical EndoscopyMorbid ObesityWeight LossBariatricsComplex incisional hernia with mesh

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Weight Loss

    We will track patient's weight loss after their endoscopic bariatric surgery.

    1 Year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Hernia Repair

    1 year

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Hernia Repair

    3 years

Study Arms (1)

Weight Loss

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with complex incisional/ventral hernias who are too obese to undergo hernia repair.

Procedure: Endoscopic Gastric Plication

Interventions

Evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic suturing for weight loss

Also known as: Endoscopic Sleeve Plication, Apollo Suturing
Weight Loss

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Body mass index (BMI) ³35 kg/m2
  • Documented incisional hernia
  • Age ≥ 18 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior gastric surgery
  • Prior bariatric surgery
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
  • Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF)
  • Unable to tolerate general anesthesia
  • Portal Hypertension
  • Underlying coagulopathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Le Huu Nho R, Mege D, Ouaissi M, Sielezneff I, Sastre B. Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg. 2012 Oct;149(5 Suppl):e3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

    PMID: 23142402BACKGROUND
  • Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4104-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

    PMID: 23860608BACKGROUND
  • Cote GA, Edmundowicz SA. Emerging technology: endoluminal treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):991-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.016.

    PMID: 19879407BACKGROUND
  • Familiari P, Costamagna G, Blero D, Le Moine O, Perri V, Boskoski I, Coppens E, Barea M, Iaconelli A, Mingrone G, Moreno C, Deviere J. Transoral gastroplasty for morbid obesity: a multicenter trial with a 1-year outcome. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1248-58. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.046.

    PMID: 22136774BACKGROUND
  • Brethauer SA, Chand B, Schauer PR, Thompson CC. Transoral gastric volume reduction as intervention for weight management: 12-month follow-up of TRIM trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

    PMID: 22178565BACKGROUND
  • Brethauer SA, Chand B, Schauer PR, Thompson CC. Transoral gastric volume reduction for weight management: technique and feasibility in 18 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

    PMID: 20947451BACKGROUND
  • Abu Dayyeh BK, Rajan E, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):530-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.197. Epub 2013 May 24.

    PMID: 23711556BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity, MorbidWeight Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ObesityOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Weight Changes

Study Officials

  • Stanley J. Rogers, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jonathan T Carter, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Matthew YC Lin, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • John P Cello, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2014

First Posted

March 5, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2021

Study Completion

July 1, 2021

Last Updated

July 15, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations