Computerized Decision Support Tool for Pain Management in Primary Care
Pain Management in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computerized Decision Support Tool
1 other identifier
interventional
528
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Chronic pain is highly prevalent, compromises quality of life, and increases care utilization. Primary care providers are challenged to provide effective treatments, use opioid therapy appropriately, and address the adverse consequences of pain. Technology-enabled decision support tools may provide a means to improve pain management in primary care. The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tool-plus-education intervention for pain management in primary care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2021
CompletedJanuary 22, 2021
January 1, 2021
2.4 years
January 15, 2021
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Worst Pain Intensity
Worst pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe worst pain intensity.
From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation
Average Pain Intensity
Average pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe average pain intensity.
From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation
Pain Interference with Function
Pain interference T-score, measured on the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form. Higher scores indicate more pain interference with function.
From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Worst Pain Intensity
From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation
Average Pain Intensity
From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation
Pain Interference with Function
From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation
Uptake of the PMSS-PC intervention tool
From baseline to 12 months following intervention implementation
Study Arms (2)
Early intervention
EXPERIMENTALThree sites received the Pain Management Support System for Primary Care (PMSS-PC) integrated into the Electronic Health Record.
Delayed intervention
OTHERDelayed wait-list control group. Three additional sites received the intervention 6 months after the first arm.
Interventions
The Pain Management Support System for Primary Care (PMSS-PC) generated "best practice alerts" and gave clinicians access to a pain assessment template, measures of psychological distress and substance use, guidelines for drug and non-drug therapies, and facilitated referrals. At implementation, clinicians at the practices were offered in-person and virtual education through six webinars on best practices for pain.
Delayed wait-list control group. The second arm involved three additional sites receiving the PMSS-PC intervention 6 months after the first arm. Initial outcomes from the PMSS-PC Experimental Intervention arm were compared to those of this Wait-list Control arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Treated at the Institute for Family Health
- Spoke English or Spanish
- Received one or more prescriptions for an opioid or nonopioid analgesic during the past three months
- Pain screening at the prior three office visits documented scores \>3 on the 0-6 scale (FACES, Hicks et al., 2001).
- Willingness to complete questionnaires three times
- A commitment to return to the practice
- Reachable by phone
- No evidence of psychopathology or cognitive impairment severe enough to prevent informed consent or completing the survey instruments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Carelead
- Pfizercollaborator
- The Institute for Family Healthcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2021
First Posted
January 20, 2021
Study Start
November 11, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01