NCT02767011

Brief Summary

Abstract: It is intuitive that post discharge surgical complications are associated with increased patient dissatisfaction, and directly associated with an increase in medical expenditures. It is also easy to make the connection that many post hospital discharge surgical complications including surgical site infections could be influenced or exacerbated by patient co-morbidities. The authors of a recent study reported that female gender, obesity, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, critical limb ischemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea, and neurologic disease were all of among significant predictors of surgical site infections after vascular reconstruction was performed. The main concern for optimal patient care especially in geographically isolated areas of West Virginia is to have early, expeditious, and prompt diagnosis of early surgical site infection with subsequent indicated interventions. This theme will lead to patient satisfaction, minimizing third party interventions and decrease the total cost associated with these complications. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to believe that monitoring using telehealth technology and managing the general health care patients receive after a hospital vascular intervention will improve overall health and reduce post-operative complications. Aims/Objectives: 1\. The primary objective of the current project is to compare early and late outcomes for patients who receive post discharge health care monitoring (which includes using Telehealth electronic monitoring; THEM) to patients who receive standard of care (SOC) and routine discharge instructions and no monitoring. Methods:

  1. 1.Randomize patients who are scheduled to have revascularization interventions with groin incisions to receive either telehealth electronic health care monitoring or normal standard of follow-up care.
  2. 2.Follow patients for 4 weeks, record any 30-day hospital readmissions or complications. In addition, have participants complete the follow-up survey questionnaires.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 5, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 18, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 18, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

May 5, 2016

Results QC Date

December 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 15, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

surgical site infection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • 30-Day Readmission (Any)

    Yes/No was patient readmitted? Patients were monitored for 30 days to see if they were re-admitted to the hospital for any reason. Percentage of patients with 30-day readmission.

    30-day

  • 30-day Wound Readmission

    Yes/No was patient readmitted for wound infection? Patients were monitored for 30 days to see if they were re-admitted to the hospital for wound infection. Percentage of patients with 30-day readmission for wound infection.

    30-day

  • Access Site/Wound Infections.

    Yes/No did patient any access site or would infections? Access site wounds for the patients were monitored for 30 days for any wound infections.

    30-day

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • The Difference Between Baseline and 30-day Quality of Life (Short-Form 8) Physical Summary Score

    30-day

  • Patient Satisfaction as Measured by the General Satisfaction Sub-scale of the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ18)

    30-day

  • Number of Participants With Home Nursing Visits

    30-day

  • Stroke

    30-day

  • Myocardial Infarction

    30-day

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

THEM

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive telehealth electronic health care monitoring.

Other: Tele-Health Electronic Monitoring (THEM)

Standard of Care (SOC)

NO INTERVENTION

Patients receive normal standard of follow-up care

Interventions

Patients in the intervention group (THEM) will receive a tablet computer and home monitoring medical devices with sensors to transmit the information to a central website that will be monitored by care managers. Medical devices will include weight scales, blood pressure cuffs and blood glucometers. Clinical care mangers will remotely monitor the patients and all electronic readings. Clinical care managers will call or send text messages to the patients based on alerts generated by the tele-health monitoring system.

THEM

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Patients with any planned vascular procedures with cut-down access to the groin and treated by one of the Charleston Area Medical Center -Vascular Surgeons in the Vascular Center (VCOE) will be consented and enrolled.

You may not qualify if:

  • do not plan to do follow-up visit at the VCOE;
  • history of dementia;
  • do not have home internet service with WIFI or live outside of the provided cell coverage area (cell coverage will be provided for patients without internet WIFI).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Mousa AY, Broce M, Davis E, McKee B, Yacoub M. Telehealth electronic monitoring to reduce postdischarge complications and surgical site infections after arterial revascularization with groin incision. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1902-1908. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.063.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Vascular DiseasesSurgical Wound Infection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesWound InfectionInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mike Broce
Organization
Charleston Area Medical Center Research Institute

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Albeir Mousa MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2016

First Posted

May 10, 2016

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 18, 2019

Results First Posted

April 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share