Isobaric Spinal Ropivacaine Versus Hyperbaric Spinal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients
Isobaric Ropivacaine 15 mg Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 12.5 mg for Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
52
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with isobaric ropivacaine, compared with hyperbaric bupivacaine in geriatric patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2016
CompletedJune 7, 2016
June 1, 2016
2.9 years
May 2, 2016
June 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Changes in the extent and duration of sensory block
The assessment of sensory block to pinprick was performed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 min after the intrathecal injection and then every 15 min until regression to L5. Results of the pinprick test were determined bilaterally at midclavicular level by using a short-beveled 27-gauge needle. Response to pain we determined by asking the patient whether or not he feels pain with the pinprick.
within 2 years
Changes in the extent and duration of motor block
Motor block in the lower limb was assessed by using a modified Bromage scale (0 = no paralysis , 1 = unable to raise extended leg , 2 = unable to flex knee , 3 = unable to flex ankle). These assessments were performed immediately after the assessments of sensory block until the return of normal motor function.
within 2 years
Changes in the heart rate
All patients of these 2 groups were assessed and monitored for Haemodynamics using ECG for heart rate (HR). Baseline values were defined as heart rate values before the preanesthetic infusion. The values were recorded before the induction and then every 5 min until discharge from the recovery room.
within 2 years
Changes in the non invasive mean arterial blood pressure
All patients of these 2 groups were assessed and monitored for Haemodynamics as regards non invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). Baseline values were defined as blood pressure values before the preanesthetic infusion. The values were recorded before the induction and then every 5 min until discharge from the recovery room.
within 2 years
Respiratory depression
Respiratory depression (defined as respiratory rate \< 8 min and SPO 2 \< 90%)
within 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Hyperbaric bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
Isobaric ropivacaine
EXPERIMENTAL15 mg of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine
Interventions
12.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
15 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III aged 65 years and above of average height, and scheduled for total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics and contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
D'Souza AD, Saldanha NM, Monteiro AD. Comparison of Intrathecal Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine, Isobaric 0.5% Levobupivacaine and Isobaric 0.75% Ropivacaine for Lower Abdominal Surgeries. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research (IJHSR). 2014;4(1):22-9.
BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2016
First Posted
May 6, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share