Study Stopped
Delayed due to COVID and no longer relevant
Spinal Anesthetic for Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery - Intrathecal Morphine or Hydromorphone
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In the current healthcare system, a short length of stay is paramount, for medical, functional, and financial reasons. Most patients undergoing hip and knee replacement at Hôpital Montfort institution receive spinal anesthetic, with intrathecal morphine for enhanced analgesia. However, morphine can cause urinary retention, nausea or vomiting resulting in increased length of stay (LOS). Based mainly on local experience, The investigators believe hydromorphone may be a good alternative (1). According to the literature review, no adult study compares morphine and hydromorphone. QUESTIONS Does intrathecal hydromorphone lead to equal or better pain control/post-operative function, with fewer side effects than morphine? OBJECTIVES. Primary objective: to demonstrate that hydromorphone is the choice narcotic for spinal anesthesia for arthroplasty patients. Secondary objectives:
- increased patient satisfaction
- decreased hospital length of stay METHODOLOGY The investigators propose a prospective randomized double-blind trial with three groups of 155 patients each undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), striving for similar proportions of each procedure in all three groups.
- Group 1: spinal anesthetic with standard painkillers, without intrathecal narcotics (ie "placebo" group)
- Group 2: spinal anesthetic with intrathecal morphine
- Group 3: spinal anesthetic with intrathecal hydromorphone The primary outcome measure will be urinary retention. Secondary outcome measures will be nausea/vomiting, pain control, post-operative function and length of stay. RESULTS The investigators expect to show that intrathecal hydromorphone will provide the best combination of post-operative patient pain control and function, with diminished negative side effects. They hope to extrapolate this to a potential out-patient arthroplasty program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2021
CompletedMarch 31, 2022
February 1, 2020
12 months
February 5, 2020
March 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Urinary retention
measured with bladder scan, number of catheterizations required (yes/no)
immediately after surgery
Nausea and vomiting
use of anti-emetics - episodes of nausea and vomiting will be reported by nurses, use of anti-emetics will be recorded (yes/no, count)
immediately after surgery
Pain scores
visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)
before surgery
Pain scores
visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)
immediately after surgery
Pain scores
visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)
one day after surgery
Specific patient-reported outcomes for arthroplasty
Oxford Knee/Hip Score (ranges from 0=worst outcome to 48= better outcome)
immediately after surgery
Specific patient-reported outcomes for arthroplasty
Oxford Knee/Hip Score (ranges from 0=worst outcome to 48= better outcome)
one month after surgery
Study Arms (3)
spinal anesthetic without intrathecal narcotic
ACTIVE COMPARATORspinal anesthetic with standard painkillers without intrathecal narcotics
spinal anesthetic with morphine
EXPERIMENTALspinal anesthetic with 100 micrograms of intrathecal morphine
spinal anesthetic with hydromorphone
EXPERIMENTALspinal anesthetic with 20 micrograms of intrathecal hydromorphone
Interventions
prospective randomized double-blind study of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement, as well as partial knee replacements (medial, lateral, patellafemoral, or bilateral). All groups will be matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and type of surgery. An attempt will be made to achieve a similar proportion of THA, TKA, and partial knee replacements in each group. We will randomize patients to one group of spinal anesthesia protocole.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all patients having a hip or knee replacement at Hôpital Montfort,
- candidates for spinal anaesthetic,
- and who give their consent
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to morphine or hydromorphone;
- spinal anesthetic is contra-indicated;
- patients who cannot or refuse to give consent;
- all emergency cases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hopital Montfortlead
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2020
First Posted
February 21, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 31, 2021
Study Completion
March 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share