NCT04280939

Brief Summary

In the current healthcare system, a short length of stay is paramount, for medical, functional, and financial reasons. Most patients undergoing hip and knee replacement at Hôpital Montfort institution receive spinal anesthetic, with intrathecal morphine for enhanced analgesia. However, morphine can cause urinary retention, nausea or vomiting resulting in increased length of stay (LOS). Based mainly on local experience, The investigators believe hydromorphone may be a good alternative (1). According to the literature review, no adult study compares morphine and hydromorphone. QUESTIONS Does intrathecal hydromorphone lead to equal or better pain control/post-operative function, with fewer side effects than morphine? OBJECTIVES. Primary objective: to demonstrate that hydromorphone is the choice narcotic for spinal anesthesia for arthroplasty patients. Secondary objectives:

  • increased patient satisfaction
  • decreased hospital length of stay METHODOLOGY The investigators propose a prospective randomized double-blind trial with three groups of 155 patients each undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), striving for similar proportions of each procedure in all three groups.
  • Group 1: spinal anesthetic with standard painkillers, without intrathecal narcotics (ie "placebo" group)
  • Group 2: spinal anesthetic with intrathecal morphine
  • Group 3: spinal anesthetic with intrathecal hydromorphone The primary outcome measure will be urinary retention. Secondary outcome measures will be nausea/vomiting, pain control, post-operative function and length of stay. RESULTS The investigators expect to show that intrathecal hydromorphone will provide the best combination of post-operative patient pain control and function, with diminished negative side effects. They hope to extrapolate this to a potential out-patient arthroplasty program.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 31, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

knee replacementhip replacementspinal anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Urinary retention

    measured with bladder scan, number of catheterizations required (yes/no)

    immediately after surgery

  • Nausea and vomiting

    use of anti-emetics - episodes of nausea and vomiting will be reported by nurses, use of anti-emetics will be recorded (yes/no, count)

    immediately after surgery

  • Pain scores

    visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)

    before surgery

  • Pain scores

    visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)

    immediately after surgery

  • Pain scores

    visual analog pain scale (ranges from 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever), use of analgesics (yes/no, count)

    one day after surgery

  • Specific patient-reported outcomes for arthroplasty

    Oxford Knee/Hip Score (ranges from 0=worst outcome to 48= better outcome)

    immediately after surgery

  • Specific patient-reported outcomes for arthroplasty

    Oxford Knee/Hip Score (ranges from 0=worst outcome to 48= better outcome)

    one month after surgery

Study Arms (3)

spinal anesthetic without intrathecal narcotic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

spinal anesthetic with standard painkillers without intrathecal narcotics

Procedure: spinal anesthesia

spinal anesthetic with morphine

EXPERIMENTAL

spinal anesthetic with 100 micrograms of intrathecal morphine

Procedure: spinal anesthesia

spinal anesthetic with hydromorphone

EXPERIMENTAL

spinal anesthetic with 20 micrograms of intrathecal hydromorphone

Procedure: spinal anesthesia

Interventions

prospective randomized double-blind study of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement, as well as partial knee replacements (medial, lateral, patellafemoral, or bilateral). All groups will be matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and type of surgery. An attempt will be made to achieve a similar proportion of THA, TKA, and partial knee replacements in each group. We will randomize patients to one group of spinal anesthesia protocole.

spinal anesthetic with hydromorphonespinal anesthetic with morphinespinal anesthetic without intrathecal narcotic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • all patients having a hip or knee replacement at Hôpital Montfort,
  • candidates for spinal anaesthetic,
  • and who give their consent

You may not qualify if:

  • allergy to morphine or hydromorphone;
  • spinal anesthetic is contra-indicated;
  • patients who cannot or refuse to give consent;
  • all emergency cases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, Spinal

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Posted

February 21, 2020

Study Start

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion

March 31, 2021

Study Completion

March 31, 2021

Last Updated

March 31, 2022

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share