NCT02763826

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) amplitude and electrode montage that is both safe and efficacious

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 8, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 23, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 5, 2016

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 26, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 26, 2019

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 13, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 13, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

January 23, 2015

Results QC Date

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 12, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationtDCS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Major Response

    Major response is any of the following: * Second degree scalp burn at the site of electrode pad; or * Seizure; or * New lesion(s) on Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) sequence of MRI scan and the lesion(s) not explained by any other cause(s) or decreased Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) under the electrode stimulating motor cortex area; * Discontinuation of subject from the study due to any of above. In a 3+3 design, 3 subjects are recruited for a given tDCS dose level. The trial is stopped if ≥2 of 3 subjects at a given tDCS dose level show major response. If only 1 of 3 subjects shows major response, 3 more subjects are recruited at a given tDCS dose level and a major response in any of them will stop the trial. Otherwise, same procedure is followed for the next tDCS dose level. Maximum tolerable dose will be the tDCS dose at the level before stopping of the trial.

    Immediately after intervention on the day of tDCS application

Study Arms (2)

Determine the Optimal tDCS current

EXPERIMENTAL

We will invesitigate the optimal curent in range of 1 mA to 4 mA. We hypothesize that 4 mA is tolerable, safe and can induce the highest level of cortical excitability in the lesional motor cortex.

Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

Determine the optimal tDCS electrode montage

EXPERIMENTAL

We hypothesize that the bi-hemispheric stimulation with anodal stimulation on the lesional hemisphere and simultaneous cathodal stimulation on the non-lesional hemisphere induces more cortical excitability in the lesional hemisphere than either anodal stimulation on the affected hemisphere or cathodal stimulation on non-lesional hemisphere alone.

Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

Interventions

brain stimulation using progressively increasing amounts of direct currents and in a variety of electrode montages

Also known as: tdcs
Determine the Optimal tDCS currentDetermine the optimal tDCS electrode montage

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old with a first-ever ischemic stroke that occurred at least 6 months ago;
  • Finished rehabilitation therapy(including inpatient or outpatient Physical Therapy (PT) / Occupational Therapy (OT) / Speech Therapy (SP)) at least one month ago;
  • Unilateral limb weakness with Fugl Meyer-Upper Extremity Scale score less than 56 (out of 66);
  • Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) is inducible on abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle on the affected side by TMS.

You may not qualify if:

  • Primary intracerebral hematoma, or subarachnoid hemorrhage,
  • Bihemispheric ischemic strokes;
  • History of prior stroke or old infarct demonstrated on the CT or MRI or documented in medical records;
  • Other concomitant neurological disorders affecting upper extremity motor function;
  • Documented history of dementia before or after stroke;
  • Documented history of uncontrolled depression or psychiatric disorder either before or after stroke which could affect their ability to participate in the experiment;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension despite treatment, specifically Systolic blood pressure (SBP)/ Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) \>= 180/100 mmHg at baseline;
  • Presence of any MRI/tDCS/TMS risk factors: a) an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system; b) non-fixed metal in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to eye; c) pregnancy, since the effect of tDCS on the fetus is unknown; d) history of seizure disorder or post-stroke seizure; e) preexisting scalp lesion, bone defect or hemicraniectomy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chhatbar PY, Chen R, Deardorff R, Dellenbach B, Kautz SA, George MS, Feng W. Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study. Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Scott Hutchison, Manager of COBRE Research Operations
Organization
Medical University or SC

Study Officials

  • Wuwei Feng, MD, MS

    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROL

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2015

First Posted

May 5, 2016

Study Start

December 8, 2014

Primary Completion

April 26, 2019

Study Completion

April 26, 2019

Last Updated

October 13, 2021

Results First Posted

October 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Locations